Re H. K. (an Infant)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 - Articles : S-2
• Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 - Articles : S-3
• Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 - Articles : SCH-1

[See more]

• Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne

DISTINGUISHES

• Shareef v Commissioner for Registration of Indian and Pakistani Residents

REFERS TO

• Liversidge v Anderson

CITED in

• Perron v Central Land Council
• Millar v Bornholt
• Waco v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

[See more]

• Colin Steen v Worksafe Victoria
• Attorney-General (Nsw) v Quin
• Burroughs and Another v Rampargat Katwaroo
• Barnwell v Attorney-General and Another
• Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
• Menteri Sumber Manusia and Another v Association of Bank Officers, Peninsular Malaysia
• Smith v Police Commissioner

CONSIDERED in

• Mario Santillo (Applicant v The Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• R v Gwent County Council
• R v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte and Others

[See more]

• Re Emmanuel et Al
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R v The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R v Secretary of state for the home department ex parte Frank Hughtons Yemoh
• R MS Shanila Kanwal v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Bernard v Mayor, Aldermen, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Port of Spain
• Symes v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica
• Re Elder et Al
• Johnson v Bahamas Princess Resort and Casino
• Globe Detective and Protective Agency Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Police et Al
• R v The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• Elmoalis Ltd v The Attorney General of Anguilla
• Elmoalis Ltd v The Attorney General of Anguilla
• Re Mohamed Arif (an Infant)
• Derya Kartal Karagul v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Hosenball
• Blake All E.R v Barker
• Brandt v The Attorney General and Austin
• Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
• Mucklow v The Minister of Home Affairs
• Hon. Shawn K. Richards Claimant v The Constituency Boundaries Commission 1st Defendant Attorney General of St. Christopher and Nevis 2nd Defendant [ECSC]
• Bahadur v A.G. of T & T
• Re the Caymanian Protection Law (Revised)
• R (NA) v London Borough of Croydon
• Re Tommy Crutchfield
• Hunt v Persad et Al
• Ashish Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen, Minister of Immigration, Director of Immigration and The Attorney General v ex parte Rufa

REFERRED in

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Santillo; Santillo v Secretary of State for the Home Department (131/79)
• Padmore v Secretary of state for the home department
• R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Harnaik Singh

[See more]

• Mohammed Ach-Charki v Entry clearance officer, Rabat
• R v Aston University Senate, ex parte Roffey
• Secretary of state for the home department v Alibhai
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Taore
• Gaima v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Trigger v Australian Telecommunications Commission
• Salemi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Thirukumar
• United Engineering Workers' Union v Devanayagam
• Anandarajan and Others v Mahadevan
• Minister of Labour and Manpower and Another; Pahang South Union Omnibus Company Bhd
• Yusof bin Sudin v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Polis
• Re Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus and Another The Governor of Pentonville Prison ex parte Mohammed Azam and Another Secretary of State for the Home Department and Ors ex parte Gurbax Singh Khera and Another The Secretary of Stats for Home Affairs
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Thakrar
• R (Murungaru) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Mughal
• Citizens UK, R v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• The Queen (on the application of Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPLIED in

• R v Secretary of State for Trade, ex parte Perestrello
• R v Birmingham City Justice, ex parte Chris Foreign Foods (Wholesalers) Ltd
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida

FOLLOWED in

• Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan and Another

DISTINGUISHED in

• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] 1 All ER 226
• [1967] 2 QB 617
• [1967] 2 WLR 962

COMMENTED in

• R (L) v West London Mental Health NHS Trust