Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another

Core Citations

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1880] UKHL J0323-1
• 5 APPCAS 214

CONSIDERED in

• Samad v District Court of New South Wales
• Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd v Victorian Rail Track
• Application by Brian William Shaw and Another v Application by Brian William Shaw and Another

[See more]

• Water Administration Ministerial Corporation v Mills Engsta Pty Ltd v Mills
• The Queen v Lyndsey Winston Chan
• Commissioner of Police v Roberta Francine Barnett
• John William Adams v Earl Shane Clements
• Commissioner of Taxes v Tourism Holdings Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 001 789 957) [NTCA]
• Arthur Que Noy, Marjorie Foster, Maxine Hill, Mickey Foster and Rhonda Foster v Jimmy Tapgnuk, Tommy Wurra, Albert Myoung and Biddy Lindsay and Northern Land Council [NTLR]
• Carolyn Cintana v Robert Roland Burgoyne
• Ljupco Slaveski v Victoria Legal Aid
• Toreq El Bayeh v The Queen
• Pyrenees Shire Council v Day
• Kontis v Coroners Court of Victoria
• Ballantyne v Workcover Authority of NSW
• Franklin v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
• Reynolds Jeanette v Whittens and Reynolds Stuart v Whittens
• State of Victoria v Patricia Dorothy Levine
• Re Ghi (A Protected Person)
• Ex parte NSW Police Service; Re Listening Devices Act 1984 — Application No. ST03/173
• Perrett v Williams
• Rta v Weir
• Byrne v Dun Laoghaire Corporation and The Minister for Local Government
• SKN Choice Times Ltd v Attorney General of St. Kitts & Nevis
• Tcn Channel 9 v Antoniadis [No 2]
• Rodden v R
• Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• B.M. and Another v Chief Appeals Officer and Others
• O'Hare v DPP
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

CITED in

• Minister of Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB
• The Wik Peoples v State of Queensland and Others; The Thayorre People v State of Queensland and Others
• Beetham v Trinidad Cement Ltd

[See more]

• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Hay
• Cortina Villas v Planning Appeals Trib
• Irish Land Commission v Patrick Magorian, Robert James Watson, Hugh Alexander, and Robert Eakins
• Smith v Police Commissioner
• R.m. For Judicial Review V. The Scottish Ministers
• R (GC) and Another v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis
• Jamaicans for Justice v Police Service Commission and Attorney General
• Brady v Cavan County Council
• Dawn Lynette Bell v Peter Crewes

REFERRED in

• Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis and Goldstein Ltd
• Alami Vegetable Oil Products Sdn Bhd v Lombard Commodities Ltd
• Chan Kok Poh v Pp & Other Appeals

[See more]

• Coates v Fennessy, Ltd
• Lew on @ Lew Tee Yee v Mohammad Muhamed Avvuu; Setiamas Sdn Bhd and Another (Third Party)
• Preston v Greene
• Mohammad Zaidie Zawawi v Dato’ Abdul Razak Musa (Pengerusi, Lembaga Pencegahan Jenayah) & Yang Lain
• R (on the application of Great Yarmouth Port Company and Great Yarmouth Port Authority v Marine Management Organisation Bourne Leisure (Hopton) Ltd (Interested Party)
• Alliance and Dublin Consumers' Gas Company v Davies
• Duffy v Corporation of Dublin
• McEldowney v Forde
• Re Dunne
• Kenny (t/a Denture Express) v Dental Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Refugee and Migrant Forum of Essex and London (“Ramfel”) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• McEldowney v Forde
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union
• Day v Haine and Another

FOLLOWED in

• Government of Malaysia; Merdeka University Bhd
• The King (Local Government Board) v The Guardians of The Poor of Letterkenny Union

APPLIED in

• Jacques Scott & Company Ltd v Moxam
• Nigel Leslie Collard (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Mining & Industrial Holdings, Ltd
• Collard (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Mining & Industrial Holdings Ltd

COMMENTED in

• Neville Cenac Claimant v The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendant [ECSC]

DISTINGUISHED in

• RM v Scottish Ministers