Roberts v Hopwood

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R v Vestry of St. Pancras
• R v Adamson
• R (Bridgman) v Drury

[See more]

• The King (at the prosecution of Alderman King-Kerr and Others) v R J. Newell, Auditor of The Local Government Board
• Vernon v Vestry of St. James, Westminster

REFERS TO

• R v Roberts, ex parte Scurr
• The Local Government Act (Matlock Bath District)

CONSIDERS

• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-247
• Baths and Washhouses Act 1846
• Public Health Act 1875

[See more]

• Metropolis Management Act 1855
• Public Libraries Act 1892

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1925] UKHL J0403-2
• 23 LGR 337
• 23 LGR 337

[See more]

• [1925] 89 JP 105
• [1925] AC 578

CITED in

• Fuller [G00190]
• Tearse [H00234]
• Lewis [G00209]

[See more]

• Hathway [E00734]
• Hudgell [F00975]
• Hall [G00189]
• Ford [H00023]
• Sharp [H00029]
• Winter [E00697]
• Tomlinson [F00953]
• Kennerley [G00008]
• Wardle [H00169]
• Re Dickson. Re Local Government Act, 1933
• English [E00461]
• Wilkey [E00422]
• Snelling [E00688]
• Rowlatt [G00329]
• Stone [G00278]
• Holwell [E00735]
• Pearce [E00702]
• White [E00784]
• Frawley [E00691]
• Woollard [E00700]
• Bryant [G00167]
• Liddell [E00704]
• Wafv of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal
• Everett [F00974]
• Smith [H00028]
• Rayner [G00002]
• Hayes [G00006]
• Baggott [G00284]
• Jackman [F00932]
• Booth [E00698]
• The Reverend Paul Nicolson v Grant Thornton Uk Llp London Borough of Haringey Tottenham Magistrates' Court (Interested Parties)
• R v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland ex parte Blair
• Lewis and Others v Walker
• Pugh [E00689]
• Clarke [G00322]
• Restick [F00927]
• Thompson [G00658]
• Turrall-Clarke [F00034]
• Hoskins [G00033]
• Mapson [F00924]
• Stevens [E00695]
• Khatri [E00566]
• Treble [E00692]
• Saunders [G00253]
• Branley [F00272]
• Bateman [F00415]
• Toll [E00703]
• Rodgers [E00690]
• Chanin [G00035]
• Church [F00928]
• Maxwell [E00699]
• Sansom [E00701]
• Goldwater [H00052]
• McGregor [F00923]
• Chambers [G00034]
• Magee [F00925]
• Philpot [E00769]
• Tweedale [F00935]
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Gordon [E00732]
• Tickner [F00976]
• Bloom [F00926]
• Roots [E00774]
• Drabwell [G00338]
• Taylor [G00278]
• Brant [H00001]
• Trimmer [G00007]
• Stoneham [F00927]
• Adelaide Corporation v Attorney-General (South Australia)
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Watts
• Ashurst [E00449]
• Lewis and Others v Walker
• Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman
• Re Croft (Application for Judicial Review)
• The Wik Peoples v State of Queensland and Others; The Thayorre People v State of Queensland and Others
• Pittwater Council (ABN 61 340 837 871) v Keystone Projects Group Pty Ltd (ABN 87 132 932 917)
• R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council
• R Clarke v Birmingham City Council
• Gibb v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
• Joanna Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council

REFERRED in

• Brown v Dagenham Urban Council
• Mid Density Development Pty Ltd v Rockdale Municipal Council
• R v Minister of Health, ex parte Dore

[See more]

• Evans v Collins
• Field v Borough of Poplar
• Asher v Lacey
• Attorney General v Guardians of the Poor Law Union, Tynemouth
• Barrs v Bethell
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Cumings v Bickenhead Corporation
• Woolwich Corporation v Roberts
• Gibb v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
• Adelaide Corporation v Attorney-General (South Australia)
• Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council v Watts
• Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
• Asher v Secretary of State for the Environment
• OCBC Ltd v Pendaftar Hakmilik, Negeri Kedah (1990) 1 MSTC 3, 150;
• National Water Commission v Duffus (Balteano)
• Fomento (Sterling Area) Ltd v Selsdon Fountain Pen Company Ltd
• Short v Poole Corporation
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Quigley and Others v Minister for Education and Others
• School Facility Management Ltd v Governing Body of Christ the King College
• The Queen v The Greater London Council, ex parte Greater London Borough of Bromley
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government

CONSIDERED in

• Vanterpool and Others v Crown Attorney and Another
• Burnett v Customs and Excise Comptroller and Another
• Re Hanoman (Carl)

[See more]

• Evans v Collins
• Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council (plaintiff) v Frank Shaw
• Prime v Serrette
• Da Costa v Minister of National Security and Others
• Taylor v The Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of The City of Bridgetown
• Clinch v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• James Foster and Eastbourne Borough Council and Peter Arkell (District Auditor)
• R v London Borough of Ealing and Another
• Walter v State of New South Wales
• Terry William Asher, Roy Booker, Charles Bunting, George Henry Goodfellow, David Michael Nuttall, David Percival, David Skinner, Graham Smith, Arthur Wellon, Margaret Eileen Wholey and The Secretary of State for the Environment (Plaintiffs Appellants Defendant Respondent) H. Harrison (Defendant Respondent)
• Burroughs and Another v Rampargat Katwaroo
• Barnwell v Attorney-General and Another
• Hampshire CC v Beazer Homes Ltd
• Tolfab v Tie
• Avopiling (NSW) Pty Ltd v Menard Bachy Pty Ltd
• Forbes Shire Council v Pace
• CC Builders (Aust) Pty Ltd v Milestone Civil Pty Ltd
• Holdmark v Melhemcorp
• Pacific General v Soliman & Sons
• Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction v H&M Engineering & Construction
• Siemens v Tolco;Tolco v Siemens
• RTA v John Holland
• Lanskey v Noxequin
• R (Hossack) v Kettering BC and Another
• Clyde Bergemann Senior Thermal Pty Ltd (acn 064 837 663) v Max Tonkin
• Dacosta v Minister of National Security et Al
• Karen Bevans v Belize Tourism Board
• Mello v Commissioner of Police and Superintendent of Prisons
• Reiby Street Apartments v Winterton Constructions
• Lambert Nelson v Castries Constituency Council
• Nelson v Castries Constituency Council
• R Clarke v Birmingham City Council
• Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd v DSD Builders Pty Ltd
• R Mavalon Care Ltd and Others v Pembrokeshire County Council
• Timwin Construction v Facade Innovations
• Binno Merchant Claimant v Attorney General The Public Service Commission Respondents/Defendants [ECSC]
• John Hanita Paki and Others v Attorney-General of New Zealand for and on Behalf of The Crown
• Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council
• Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Bahamas Air Traffic Controllers Union et Al.v Government of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas et Al
• Seereeram Bros Ltd v The Central Tenders Board
• R v National Arbitration Tribunal, ex parte Bolton Corporation
• Shurendy Adelson Quant v Minister of National Security and Attorney General
• Boyce v The Attorney General of Belize (on Behalf of the Government of Belize) and the Minister of Public Utilities
• DPP v EH
• Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
• Nature Island Investment Company Ltd v Marpins Telecoms and Broadcasting Ltd ((in Receivership))
• Nature Island Investment Company Ltd Appellant v Marpins Telecoms and Broadcasting Ltd ((in Receivership)) Respondent [ECSC]

FOLLOWED in

• Colton v District Auditor for Wembley Borough Council
• Pengarah Tanah dan Galian, Wilayah Persekutuan v Sri Lempah Enterprise Sdn Bhd

APPLIED in

• Attorney General v Guardians of the Poor Law Union, Tynemouth
• Ricketts v Havering London Borough Council
• Taylor v Munrow

DISTINGUISHED in

• Pickwell v Camden London Borough Council
• R Salford Estates v Salford City Council Tesco Stores Ltd (Interested Party)

RELIED UPON in

• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation

This document cites

---

• R v Roberts, ex parte Scurr
• R v Vestry of St. Pancras
• R v Adamson
• The Local Government Act (Matlock Bath District)
• R (Bridgman) v Drury



See all quotations

• Vernon v Vestry of St. James, Westminster
• Public Health Act 1875
• Baths and Washhouses Act 1846
• Public Libraries Act 1892
• Metropolis Management Act 1855
• The King (at the prosecution of Alderman King-Kerr and Others) v R J. Newell, Auditor of The Local Government Board
• Roberts v Hopwood