Extract
Barnwell v Attorney-General and Another
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CITES
-
Secretary of State for Education and Science v Metropolitan Borough Council of Tameside
-
Re Gerriah Sarran
-
Malloch v Aberdeen Corporation
[See more]
-
Practice Direction (Taking Child Out of Jurisdiction)
-
R v Kilbourne
-
Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (No. 2)
-
Stuart v Haughley Parochial Church Council
-
R v Inner London Education Authority, ex parte Westminster City Council
-
R v Broadcasting Complaints Commission, ex parte Owen
-
Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies
-
Rees v Crane
-
R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission, ex parte Argyll Group Plc
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Ruddock
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Khan
-
R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St Germain
-
A. G of Trinidad and Tobago v K C Confectionery Ltd
-
Re Westminster City Council
-
Lever Finance Ltd v Westminister (City) London Borough Council
-
Brooks and Burton Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
-
R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
-
Practice Note (Foreign Will: Proof)
-
R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Hosenball
-
Fairmount Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
-
Re H. K. (an Infant)
-
Inland Revenue Commissioner and Attorney-General v Lilleyman and Others
-
Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis v Lawrence
-
R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Jones (Ross)
-
McInnes v Onslow-Fane
-
Ceylon University v Fernando
-
Glynn v Keele University
-
Cinnamond v British Airports Authority
-
Cheall v Association of Professional Executive Clerical and Computer Staff
-
R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St. Germain (No. 2)
-
R v Disciplinary Committee of the Jockey Club, ex parte Aga Khan
-
R v Electricity Comrs.ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Company
-
Durayappah v Fernando
-
R v Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Cottrell & Rothon
-
R v Army Board of the Defence Council, ex parte Anderson
-
Maxwell v Department of Trade and Industry
-
R v Race Relations Board, ex parte Selvarajan
-
Valentine v Jackson
-
Thornhill v Attorney General
-
Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago (No 2)
-
Mohamed Ali v Teaching Service Commission
-
Société United Docks v Government of Mauritius
-
Wiseman v Borneman
-
Parry-Jones v Law Society
-
Cozens v North Devon Hospital Management Committee
-
Board of Education v Rice
-
Taylor v National Union of Seamen
-
Ramdat v Mahadeo Doobay and Another
-
Kavanagh v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall
-
Bonaker, Clerk, against Evans
-
Ridge v Baldwin
-
B. v W. (Wardship: Appeal)
-
O'Reilly v Mackman
-
Vine v National Dock Labour Board
-
Rolf Brandt v A-G of Guyana & CA Austin
-
R v Camborne Justices. ex parte Pearce
-
R v Nailsworth Licensing Justices. ex parte Bird
-
Re Pergamon Press Ltd
-
Attorney-General v Mohamed Alli and Others
-
Kent Garment Factory Ltd v Attorney-General and Another
-
Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
-
Re Application by John Ewart Langhorne
-
Tapping v Lucas
-
Attorney-General v Antigua Times Ltd
-
JW Evelyn v William Chichester
-
Thomas v Attorney-General
-
Ronald Gajraj v The State and Brigadier Clarence Arthur Leslie Price
-
Kirpaul Sookdeo and Others v The State
-
Chief Constable of the North Wales Police v Evans
-
Westminster Corporation v London and North Western Railway Company
-
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
-
Ridge v Baldwin
-
Lloyd (A.P.) and Others (A.P.) v McMahon
-
Lewis v Heffer
-
Furnell v Whangarei High Schools Board
-
John v Rees
-
Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
-
R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
-
R v Liverpool City Justices, ex parte Topping
-
R v Crown Court at Bristol, ex parte Cooper (sub nom R v Bath Licensing Justices, Ex partearte Cooper)
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
REFERRED in