The Queen v The Greater London Council, ex parte Greater London Borough of Bromley

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Luby v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation

REFERS TO

• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment

[See more]

• Roberts v Hopwood
• Luby v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation

APPROVES

• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation

CONSIDERS

• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-1
• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-3
• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-4

[See more]

• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-5
• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-6
• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-7
• Transport (London) Act 1969 - Articles : S-11
• Transport (London) Act 1969
• Housing Act 1957
• Housing Act 1957 - Articles : S-1

REFERRED in

• Nikac v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs
• R (Western Riverside Waste Authority) v Wandsworth Borough Council
• R v Greenwich London Borough Council, ex parte Lovelace

[See more]

• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• R v Hackney London Borough Council, ex parte Structadene Ltd
• I W v City of Perth
• Mendoza v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs
• Minister of Labour and Manpower and Another; Tanjong Jaga Sdn Bhd
• Nasir Manaf v Datuk Seri Panglima Joseph Pairin Kitingan
• Lembaga Minyak Sawit Malaysia v Arunamari Plantations Sdn Bhd
• R v Waltham Forest London Borough Council, ex parte Baxter
• R (Island Farm Development Ltd) v Bridgend County Borough Council
• R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council
• R v Lewisham London Borough Council, ex parte Shell U.K. Ltd
• Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council
• University of East London Higher Education Corporation v Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council and Others
• Bradford City Metropolitan Council v Arora
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• R (Hopley) v Liverpool Health Authority and Others

CITED in

• Simmonds v Heffer and Others
• Re Bropho v Tickner
• Tide Sequence Industries Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

[See more]

• Chapman and Barton v Tickner Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs
• Andary v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Lawyers for Forests Inc. v Minister for the Environment Heritage and the Arts
• St. Albans City and District Council v International Computers Ltd
• R v Director General of Fair Trading, ex parte Benhams Ltd
• Blue Wedges Inc. v Minister for the Environment, Heritage & the Arts
• Sir Gerald A Watt v (1) Attorney General (2) The Prime Minister (3) Juno Samuel Defendants

FOLLOWED in

• Chong Ket Sui David v Datuk Chau Tet on (Chairman and office bearer of Royal Sabah Turf Club for and on behalf of himself and the Management Committee of the Royal Sabah Turf Club)
• Husli bin Mok v Probate Officer, Miri
• Association of Bank Officers, Peninsular Malaysia and Another; Malayan Banking Bhd

[See more]

• A-G of Singapore; Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc.
• Ghazi bin Mohd Sawi v Mohd Haniff bin Omar, Ketua Polis Negara, Malaysia and Another
• Harpers Trading (M) Sdn Bhd v National Union of Commercial Workers
• Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
• Wong Yuen Hock v Syarikat Hong Leong Assurance Sdn Bhd

DISTINGUISHED in

• A-G of Singapore; Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc.

This document cites

• Luby v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation
• Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment
• Roberts v Hopwood
• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
• Luby v Newcastle-under-Lyme Corporation



See all quotations

• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Transport (London) Act 1969
• Housing Act 1957