Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• London CC v Attorney General
• Attorney General v Lord Mayor of Leeds
• Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service

[See more]

• Belvoir Finance Company Ltd v Stapleton
• Thomas v Devonport Corporation
• Roberts v Hopwood
• Binder v Alachouzos
• London CC v Attorney General
• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Mayor of Newcastle-upon-Tyne v Attorney General.; Attorney General v Mayor of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council
• Attorney General v Manchester Corporation
• Institution of Mechanical Engineers v Cane
• Holsworthy Urban Council v Holsworthy Rural Council
• R v Roberts
• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation
• Re John Beauforte (London) Ltd Applications of Grainger Smith & Company (Builders) Ltd, John Wright & Son (Veneers) Ltd and Lowell Baldwin Ltd
• Bar Hill Developments Ltd v South Cambridgeshire District Council
• Provident Mutual Life Assurance Association v Derby City Council

CONSIDERS

• Local Government Act 1933
• Municipal Corporations Act 1882
• Local Government Act 1888

[See more]

• London Government Act 1939
• Local Government Finance Act 1982 - Articles : S-19
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-101
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-111
• London Government Act 1963 - Articles : S-1
• Local Government Finance Act 1982 - Articles : S-13
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-161
• Local Government Act 1933 - Articles : S-228
• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-247
• London Government Act 1963
• Local Government Act 1933 - Articles : S-131
• Local Authorities (Land) Act 1963 - Articles : S-7
• Local Government Finance Act 1982 - Articles : S-15
• Building Societies Act 1986 - Articles : S-23
• General Rate Act 1967 - Articles : SCH-1
• Local Government and Housing Act 1989 - Articles : S-45
• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-151

REFERS TO

• Jenkin v Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
• Attorney General v Great Northern Railway Company
• The Queen v The Greater London Council, ex parte Greater London Borough of Bromley

[See more]

• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
• Riche v Ashbury Railway Carriage Company
• Provident Mutual Life Assurance Association v Derby City Council
• Evans v Bartlam
• Attorney General v Mayor, Company, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and the North-Eastern Railway Company
• Feret v Hill
• Bonanza Creek Gold Mining Company v R
• Singh v Ali
• Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
• The Eastern Archipelago Company against The Queen on the Prosecution of Sir James Brooke
• Smith v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company
• Great North-West Central Railway Company v Charlebois
• Osborne v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants
• Attorney General v Leicester Corporation
• Webb v Herne Bay Commissioners
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Re Norwich Provident Insurance Company. Bath's Case
• Attorney-General (on behalf of HM) v London County Council and Others

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others

APPLIES

• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation
• Attorney General v Great Eastern Railway Company

CITES

• Beecham v Metropolitan District Auditor

CONSIDERED in

• R v The London Borough of Lambeth and Another
• R v South Northamptonshire District Council and Others
• Grubb v Price Waterhouse Coopers

[See more]

• R John Richards v West Somerset Council
• R v Legal Aid Board and Another
• R and Another v The Secretary of State for the Environment and Another
• R v Brentwood Borough Council and Another
• R v Legal Aid Board and Another
• Forge Care Homes Ltd and Others (Claimants) Cardiff & Vale University Health Board and Others (Defendants) County Council of the City and County of Cardiff and Others (Interested Parties)
• The Queen v Broad District Council and Another
• Kess Thomas Lewis v Droitwich Magistrates
• R v The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex parte Nicholas Brandt
• R v Secretary of State for Education, ex parte Prior
• Newbold and Another v Leicester City Council
• R (Securiplan Plc) v Security Industry Authority
• Monsanto Plc v 1. Rowan Tilly and Others
• Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley and Another
• Barclays Bank Plc and Another (Plaintiffs) Appellants) v The Council of the London and Another Respondents)
• Monsanto Plc v 1. Rowan Tilly and Others
• R v Yorkshire Purchasing Organisation ex parte British Educational Suppliers Association
• Piffs ELM Ltd v Commission for Local Administration in England
• Richard Naylor v Essex County Council Silverbrook Estates Ltd and Others (Interested Parties)
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Westminster City Council v Haywood and Another
• R v Richmond London Borough Council ex parte McCarthy & Stone
• Gordon Peters v London Borough of Haringey
• R v Richmond London Borough Council ex parte McCarthy & Stone
• Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
• Pierce (t/a Swords Memorials) & Andrew Pierce Monuments v Dublin Cemeteries Committee and Others

REFERRED in

• R v Hertfordshire County Council, ex parte A
• Westminster City Council v Haywood (No. 2)
• R DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL v DARLINGTON BOROUGH COUNCIL [QBD, 25/07/2003]

[See more]

• Edwards v Giudice
• Phonographic Performance Ltd v South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
• R (Comninos) v Bedford Borough Council
• Grubb v PricewaterhouseCoopers and Another
• Gibb v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
• R v Broadland District Council, ex parte Lashley
• Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Birmingham City Council
• Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
• R v Liverpool City Council ex parte Barry
• Duggan v Governor of Full Sutton Prison and Another
• Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council
• School Facility Management Ltd v Governing Body of Christ the King College
• R (M and another) v Lambeth London Borough Council and another
• Akumah v Hackney London Borough Council
• R (on the application of the National Secular Society and another) v Bideford Town Council
• Newbold and Another v Leicester City Council
• Credit Suisse and Another v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
• Masri v Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL
• Guinness Mahon and Company Ltd v Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council
• Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Glasgow City Council
• Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) v Liu Cho Chit (No 2)
• Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) v Liu Cho Chit
• ACC v Comptroller of Income Tax
• Pierce (t/a Swords Memorials) & Andrew Pierce Monuments v Dublin Cemeteries Committee and Others
• R (Johnson and Others) v Havering London Borough Council; YL v Birmingham City Council
• R (Weaver) v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
• Attorney General v Trustees of the British Museum
• Brennan v Bolt Burdon (A Firm) and Others
• Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council
• R (Roberts) v Parole Board

CITED in

• London & South Eastern Railway Ltd and another v British Transport Police Authority [Administrative Court]
• Sunshine Coast Broadcasters Pty Ltd v The Australian Communications & Media Authority
• R (Looe Fuels Ltd v Looe Harbour Commissioners

[See more]

• Virdi v Law Society
• Crédit Suisse v Allerdale Borough Council
• Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council
• Haugesund Kommune v Depfa ACS Bank

APPLIED in

• De-Winter Heald and Others v London Borough of Brent
• Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council (No 1)
• R (A) v Croydon London Borough Council

[See more]

• Crédit Suisse v Allerdale Borough Council

DISTINGUISHED in

• R (on the application of Millgate Developments Ltd) v Wokingham BC

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 88 LGR 433
• [1990] 3 All ER 33
• [26/02/1990] TLR 2

[See more]

• [1990] 2 WLR 1038
• [1990] 2 QB 697

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others

This document cites

---

• Binder v Alachouzos
• Evans v Bartlam
• Institution of Mechanical Engineers v Cane
• The Queen v The Greater London Council, ex parte Greater London Borough of Bromley
• Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service



See all quotations

• Belvoir Finance Company Ltd v Stapleton
• Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corporation
• Provident Mutual Life Assurance Association v Derby City Council
• Roberts v Hopwood
• Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
• Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council
• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation
• Feret v Hill
• Rutter v Chapman
• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Bar Hill Developments Ltd v South Cambridgeshire District Council
• Attorney General v Smethwick Corporation
• Attorney General v Mayor, Company, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and the North-Eastern Railway Company
• Great North-West Central Railway Company v Charlebois
• The Eastern Archipelago Company against The Queen on the Prosecution of Sir James Brooke
• Smith v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Company
• Attorney General v Great Eastern Railway Company
• Re John Beauforte (London) Ltd Applications of Grainger Smith & Company (Builders) Ltd, John Wright & Son (Veneers) Ltd and Lowell Baldwin Ltd
• Webb v Herne Bay Commissioners
• Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
• Attorney General v Lord Mayor of Leeds
• Beecham v Metropolitan District Auditor
• Riche v Ashbury Railway Carriage Company
• Attorney General v Leicester Corporation
• Bonanza Creek Gold Mining Company v R
• Jenkin v Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
• Wenlock (Baroness) v River Dee Company (no 3)
• Attorney General v Great Northern Railway Company