Gage v King

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• Jones v Maynard
• Rimmer v Rimmer

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Schneider v Eisovitch

CONSIDERS

• Allen v Waters & Company

APPLIES

• Balfour v Balfour

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1960] 3 All ER 62
• [1960] 3 WLR 460
• [1961] 1 QB 188

REFERRED in

• Haggar v de Placido
• Attorney-General (Victoria) v Commonwealth
• Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board

[See more]

• Browning v War Office

APPLIED in

• Clark (Trustee of Bankrupt Estate of Reid) v Reid
• Coleman v Macdonald

CONSIDERED in

• Croton v R
• Nicolitsa Togias v State of New South Wales
• Worthbrook Pty Ltd

[See more]

• Basdeo v Khelawan et Al
• Johnson v Browne
• Kersey v Geddes
• Falby v Primus
• Johnson v Browne
• Coleman and MacDonald v Smith
• S andra Estelle Fielding and The Royal Bank of Scotl and Plc
• West v Mead

FOLLOWED in

• Re Bishop, deceased ; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop
• Lim Xueru and Another v Lim Kai Meng

CITED in

• Frank Coleman v Donald McDonald and Carol Smyth
• Clara Falby (Acting herein by her attorneys on record Wendell Brian Falby of Brooklyn, New York and Sharon Michelle John nee Falby of Queens, New York) Claimant v Verona Primus Defendant [ECSC]

This document cites

---

• Balfour v Balfour
• Jones v Maynard
• Schneider v Eisovitch
• Rimmer v Rimmer
• Allen v Waters & Company