Re U (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B (A Child)

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Re Et (Serious Injuries: Standard of Proof), Note

CONSIDERS

• Jimmie William Frederick Hornal v Neuberger Products Ltd
• Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
• R v Angela Cannings

[See more]

• Re Et (Serious Injuries: Standard of Proof), Note
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary
• R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court

APPLIES

• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)

CONSIDERS

• Re CB (Care Proceedings: Guidelines)
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-31
• Crime and Disorder Act 1998 - Articles : S-2

[See more]

• Children Act 1989

DISTINGUISHES

• B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary
• R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• NLJ case 154 7130 (824)
• NLJ case 154 7130 (824)
• 14/05/2004 Daily Cases

[See more]

• 154 NLJ 7130 824
• [27/05/2004] TLR 1
• [2004] 3 WLR 753
• [2005] FAM 134

REFERRED in

• The Children Act 1989 and F (A Minor) Buckinghamshire County Council v Carla Andrews (1st Respondent) Craig Stillwell (2nd Respondent) Effie Stillwell (A minor by her Guardian) (3rd Respondent)
• West Sussex County Council v M (1st Respondent) S (2nd Respondent) W (Intervener) X & Y (children) (3rd &4th Respondents) L (5th Respondent)
• A Local Authority v W

[See more]

• Re S
• A City Council v M (1st Respondent) F (2nd Respondent) Y (A Child) (3rd Respondent) MGM (4th Respondent) MGF (5th Respondent)
• A County Council v AB and Others
• Stockport MBC (Applicant) AM (1st Respondent) Dt (2nd Respondent) L & K (Infants) (by their children's guardian) (3rd Respondent) SM, LS, T & E (by the Official Solicitor) (Interveners) Stockport MBC (Applicant) SM (1st Respondent) and and Another (2nd Respondent) and and Another (3rd Respondent)
• Re AD (Children)
• G (Children)
• Re C and D (Photographs of Injuries)
• Re H and Others (Children) (Fact Finding: Rib Fractures)
• Re O (Description of Sexual Abuse)
• The King on the application of Airline Placement Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• ZZ, AZ, FA, ARA, KA and ASA (Children)
• Re H-N and Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings)
• Re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [SC]
• R (on the application of C) v Northumberland CC
• B (Children: Uncertain Perpetrator)
• A, B and C (Fact-Finding: Gonorrhoea)

CONSIDERED in

• B (Children) [B4/2005/1568]
• A Local Authority v A Mother (1st Respondent) GM (2nd Respondent) DA (3rd Respondent) AA (by her children's guardian) (4th Respondent)
• PR v JS

[See more]

• A Local Authority v A
• A Local Authority v K and N
• Bristol City Council v A Mother and Others
• A Local Authority v S (1st Respondent) W (2nd Respondent) T by His Guardian (3rd Respondent)
• Siddiqui v Health Professions Council
• A Welsh Local Authority v J (First Respondent) K (Second Respondent) L and M (by their Guardian, ) (Third Respondents) N (Intervenor)
• Broxfield Ltd v Sheffield City Council
• Birmingham City Council v H and Others
• R v Lancashire County Council
• M (Children)
• Hipgrave and Another v Jones
• Re O (Description of Sexual Abuse)
• The King on the application of Airline Placement Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• Mansion Estates Ltd v Hayre & Company (A Firm)
• R (on the application of C) v Northumberland CC
• Re R (Children) (Fact-finding hearing: applicable concepts)
• H (Children: Uncertain Perpetrator: Lies)
• TG (A Child)
• Re L (A Child) Re Oddin
• Re Uddin (A Child) (serious injury: standard of proof)
• Jim Peter Grant v Lerrie Bovell
• A, B and C (Fact-Finding: Gonorrhoea)
• Balber Kaur Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)

CITED in

• The London Borough of Ealing v AR (1st Respondent) JM (2nd Respondent) SD (3rd Respondent/Intervener) AM (A Child by her Guardian Julie Clements) (4th Respondent)
• Kirklees Council (Applicant) X (1st Respondent) Ms (2nd Respondent) Su (3rd Respondent) Gm & Gf (4th & 5th Respondents) K & L (children) (6th & 7th Respondents)
• Medway Council v M, F and G (by her children's guardian)

[See more]

• Re S (Transfer of Residence)
• Hertfordshire County Council v LC (Deceased) (1st Respondent) AC (2nd Respondent) RV & EV (3rd & 4th Respondents) L (A Child) (5th Respondent)
• M v X Borough Council
• Re Ad & Am (Fact-Finding hearing) (Application for re-hearing)
• Re P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding)
• Birmingham City Council v Mrs H [1] Mr H [2] S [3] (by her childrens guardian)
• Hertfordshire County Council v Mother
• FLR (A child by her mother and litigation friend MLR) v Dr Shanthi Chandran
• Anne Edith Powell v University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

APPLIED in

• Briggs v Drylined Homes Ltd
• Devon County Council v EB

RELIED UPON in

• In the matter of J, T, and C (Care Orders: Concurrent Criminal and Family Proceedings: Burden of Proof)

This document cites

---

• B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary
• Jimmie William Frederick Hornal v Neuberger Products Ltd
• R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court
• R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court
• R v Angela Cannings



See all quotations

• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary
• Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
• Re H and R (Child Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)
• Re CB (Care Proceedings: Guidelines)
• Re Et (Serious Injuries: Standard of Proof), Note
• Re Et (Serious Injuries: Standard of Proof), Note
• Children Act 1989
• Crime and Disorder Act 1998