Marks v Minister of Home Affairs

Core Citations

CITES

• ACAS v Grunwick Processing Laboratories Ltd
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Malloch v Aberdeen Corporation

[See more]

• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. ex parte Tong
• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• Ceylon University v Fernando
• Wiseman v Borneman
• Durayappah v Fernando
• R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner ex parte Parker
• Re H. K. (an Infant)
• Payne v Lord Harris of Greenwich
• Re Pergamon Press Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Santillo; Santillo v Secretary of State for the Home Department (131/79)
• Cinnamond v British Airports Authority
• B. v W. (Wardship: Appeal)
• Weinberger v Inglis
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• Ridge v Baldwin
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
• Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council

CONSIDERS

• Grunwick Processing Laboratories Ltd and Others (Plaintiffs) v Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (First Defendants) Association of Professional Executive Clerical and Computer Staff (Second Defendants)
• Criminal Justice Act 1967 - Articles : S-61
• British Nationality Act 1948

[See more]

• Gaming Act 1968
• Lapointe v L'Association de Bienfaisance et de Retraite de la Police de Montréal
• De Verteuil v Knaggs
• Weinberger v Inglis
• R v Leman Street Police Station Inspector, ex parte Venicoff
• Short v Poole Corporation
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Russell v Norfolk (Duke of)
• Nakkuda Ali v M. F. de S. Jayaratne
• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
• Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Soblen
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Shareef v Commissioner for Registration of Indian and Pakistani Residents
• Maradana Mosque Trustees v Mahmud
• Durayappah v Fernando
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union
• Wiseman v Borneman
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Attorney General v Ryan
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Santillo; Santillo v Secretary of State for the Home Department (131/79)
• Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council
• Attorney General of Hong-Kong v Ng Yuen Shiu

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1984) 35 WIR 106

CONSIDERED in

• Adams Brothers Engineering Ltd v Lyttle et Al
• Re Emmanuel et Al
• Leacock (Pearson) v Attorney-General

[See more]

• Next Level Engineering Ltd v Attorney General and Antigua Public Utilities Authority et. al
• (1) Ecedro Thomas; (2) Alfred Thomas; (3) Alice Thomas v The Registrar of Lands
• Next Level Engineering Ltd Claimant v Attorney General First Defendant Antigua Public Utilities Authority Second Defendant Wilmoth Daniel, Minister Responsible for Public Utilities Third Defendant Antigua Power Company Ltd Fourth Defendant [ECSC]
• Salvat v The Attorney General et Al
• Boyce et Al v Commissioner of Police et Al; Robinson v Commissioner of Police et Al; Ellis v Commissioner of Police et Al
• Pharsalus Inc. v Commission of the Guyana Geology
• Griffith v Commissioner of Police
• Ryan Jordan v Chief Personnel Officer
• Benjamin et Al v The Honourable Minister of Information and Broadcasting et Al
• Elwin v The Public Service Commission et Al
• Re Tommy Crutchfield
• Naidike and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago

CITED in

• Medical Council of Guyana v Sooknanan
• Adams Brothers Engineering Ltd Claimants v (1) Ezekiel Lyttle (2) Appellate Authority — Department of Labour Defendants [ECSC]
• [1] Siobahn Nicola Gillespie [2] Citco BVI Ltd Claimants v The Minister of Natural Resources and Labour Defendant

[See more]

• Re Haynes (Judicial Review)
• Friedman v Minister of Labour, Home Affairs and Public Safety and Others

ADOPTED in

• Bentley Roach v Attorney General

This document cites

• Re Pergamon Press Ltd
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• Schmidt v Home Office ; Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs
• Wiseman v Borneman



See all quotations

• Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
• R v Liverpool Corpn.ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association
• Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union
• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
• Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. ex parte Tong
• R v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Hook
• B. v W. (Wardship: Appeal)
• Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
• R v Governor of Brixton Prison, ex parte Soblen
• Cinnamond v British Airports Authority
• Ridge v Baldwin
• Payne v Lord Harris of Greenwich
• Weinberger v Inglis
• Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council
• Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• McInnes v Onslow-Fane
• B Surinder Singh Kanda v The Government of The Federation of Malaya
• Ceylon University v Fernando
• Attorney General v Ryan
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Santillo; Santillo v Secretary of State for the Home Department (131/79)
• Wiseman v Borneman
• R v Leman Street Police Station Inspector, ex parte Venicoff
• R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re H. K. (an Infant)
• Shareef v Commissioner for Registration of Indian and Pakistani Residents
• Durayappah v Fernando