R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA

• Sexual Offences Act 2003
• Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Data Protection Act 1998

[ver más]

• Criminal Justice Act 2003 - Artículos : S-325
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Artículos : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Artículos : SCH-1
• Criminal Justice Act 1993
• Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Artículos : S-28
• The Queen (on the application of Hassan Tabbakh) (Claimant/Appellant) v The Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust and Another
• R (Refugee Legal Centre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFIERE

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• Silver v United Kingdom (A/161)
• R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another

[ver más]

• R v Chief Constable of North Wales Police and Others, ex parte AB and Another
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Soering v United Kingdom
• Sunday Times v United Kingdom (A/30) (No 1)
• R (Hillingdon London Borough Council) v Lord Chancellor
• R (A) v Secretary of State for Health
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (X) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Joanna Letts v The Lord Chancellor The Equality & Human Rights Commission (Intervener)
• The Lord Chancellor v Detention Action Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
• Director of Legal Aid Casework and another v IS (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
• R (Howard League for Penal Reform and Another) v Lord Chancellor
• R Melanie Woolcock v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• An application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
• BF (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Paponette and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another (Liberty intervening)
• Bayer Plc v NHS Darlington CCG
• R (W, a Child by his Litigation Friend J) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of FB (Afghanistan) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
• The Christian Institute and Others v Scottish Ministers
• R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APLICA

• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority

AFIRMA

• R A v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• Arturas (Child's Best Interests: Ni Appeals)
• The Public and Commercial Services Union v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of MA and HT) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[ver más]

• Bell and another v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Others intervening)
• R (on the application of Robert Cusworth) v Secretary of State for Justice
• The King (on the Application of HL) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• R (AM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of K) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Adrian John Bailey v Secretary of State for Justice
• The King (on the application of Halton Borough Council) v Road User Charging Adjudicators
• R (MQ) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of the Good Law Project) v The Prime Minister

CONSIDERADA por

• R Advinia Health Care Ltd v Care Quality Commission
• The King on the application of AB & CD v Westminster City Council
• The King on the application of the Duke of Sussex v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[ver más]

• The King on the application of SPM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Home Office v ASY and Others
• The King (on the Application of Jackson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Robert Cusworth) v Secretary of State for Justice
• The King on the application of Cruelty Free International v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of the Humane League UK) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
• RW v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
• The King (on the application of) Rights Community Action Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
• Wyatt v Fareham Borough Council
• R (AA, CA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• The King on the application of FDA v Minister for the Cabinet Office
• The King (on the application of the Good Law Project) v The Prime Minister
• MXK, EH and HH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• CAO v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERIDA por

• Kimberly Isherwood v The Welsh Ministers
• R SPM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the application of the Duke of Sussex v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[ver más]

• The King (on the application of the Law Society of England and Wales) v The Lord Chancellor
• R BVN v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• ZR v London Borough of Haringey
• The King (on the application of Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• LJ Fairburn & Son Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
• The King on the application of World Uyghur Congress v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the application of Cruelty Free International v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of the Humane League UK) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
• R Xavier v The Governor of HMP Whitemoor and Another
• The King (on the application of MS Helen Timson) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• The Queen (on the application of KTT) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• RW v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
• The Queen (on the application of Allan Leonardo Contreras Cardona) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MA (by his litigation friend Roxanne Nanton of the Refugee Council) v Coventry City Council
• R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Preston Paris Ingold v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• R Harry Miller v The College of Policing
• Wyatt v Fareham Borough Council
• Heidi Crowter v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• KA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of) DXK v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Migrant Helpline Ltd (t/a ‘Migrant Help’) (A Charity)
• The King (on the application of Wildfish Conservation) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
• AAA (Syria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of) Ms Helen Timson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• MXK, EH and HH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mead Realisations Ltd v SoS LUHC; Redrow Homes Ltd v SoS LUHC
• The King on the application of AAA (Syria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Flight Sergeant (Ret'd) Barbara Eyton-Hughes v The Secretary of State for Defence
• (AB) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Asy and Others v Home Office

APLICADA por

• The King on the application of Ecpat UK (Every Child Protected Against Trafficking) v Kent County Council
• The Queen (on the Application of All the Citizens) v Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2021] 1 WLR 3931
• [31/08/2021] TLR 1
• [2022] 1 All ER 177

Documentos citados

• R Melanie Woolcock v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• An application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
• R (A) v Secretary of State for Health
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Hillingdon London Borough Council) v Lord Chancellor



Ver todas las citas

• R A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Christian Institute and Others v Scottish Ministers
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
• R Joanna Letts v The Lord Chancellor The Equality & Human Rights Commission (Intervener)
• The Queen (on the application of Hassan Tabbakh) (Claimant/Appellant) v The Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust and Another
• R Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
• R (Refugee Legal Centre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R v Chief Constable of North Wales Police and Others, ex parte AB and Another
• The Lord Chancellor v Detention Action Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• BF (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (X) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another (Liberty intervening)
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• Paponette and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Director of Legal Aid Casework and another v IS (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
• R (Howard League for Penal Reform and Another) v Lord Chancellor
• Bayer Plc v NHS Darlington CCG
• R (W, a Child by his Litigation Friend J) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Soering v United Kingdom
• Silver v United Kingdom (A/161)
• Sunday Times v United Kingdom (A/30) (No 1)
• R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of FB (Afghanistan) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)