KA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Linked as:
Extract
KA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
- British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
- R v Port of London Authority, ex parte Kynoch Ltd
[See more]
CITES
RELIES UPON
- R (on the application of Quila and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
- R (Ali and Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Mahabir and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
APPLIES
FOLLOWS
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
- R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission, ex parte Argyll Group Plc
CONSIDERED in
- Bal v Secretary of State for Defence
- HR v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- The King (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Bal v Secretary of State for Defence
- The King (on the application of CX1, CX2, CX4, CX6 and CX7) (“CX1 No.2”) v Secretary of State for Defence
- CX1 v Secretary of State for Defence
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Babcock et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2002) 289 N.R. 341 (SCC)
- R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- AG (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v West Berkshire District Council and Another