The King on the application of Ecpat UK (Every Child Protected Against Trafficking) v Kent County Council

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Immigration Act 2016 - Articles : S-72
• Children Act 1989
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999

[See more]

• Housing Act 1985
• Housing Act 1996
• Care Act 2014
• Children and Social Work Act 2017 - Articles : S-1
• Care Standards Act 2000
• Local Authority Social Services Act 1970 - Articles : S-7
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-17
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-47
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-20
• Immigration Act 1971
• Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 - Articles : S-55
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 - Articles : S-95
• Local Government and Housing Act 1989 - Articles : S-5
• Equality Act 2010
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-3
• Care Standards Act 2000 - Articles : S-11
• Care Standards Act 2000
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Housing Act 1996
• Children Act 1989
• Housing Act 1985
• Immigration Act 1971
• The Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010
• Equality Act 2010
• Care Act 2014
• The Contracts for Difference (Electricity Supplier Obligations) Regulations 2014
• Covid-19 Credit Guarantee Scheme 2020
• Regulation and Inspection of Social Care (Wales) Act 2016
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-84
• Care Standards Act 2000 - Articles : S-1

CONSIDERS

• Gillick (A.P.) v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and the Department of Health and Social Security (England)

REFERS TO

• The Queen ota S v Wandsworth
• R v Islington London Borough Council, ex parte Rixon
• R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings

[See more]

• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• R (JL) v Islington London Borough Council
• R (Miller and Another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union; Re McCord's application
• Re T (A Child)
• Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade

CITES

• R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council
• R (G) v London Borough of Southwark
• R (on the applications of Hooper, Withey, Naylor and Martin) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

[See more]

• R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council; R (W) v Lambeth London Borough Council; R (A) v Same

APPLIES

• R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2024] PTSR 243

CONSIDERED in

• The King on the application of ECPAT UK (Every Child Protected Against Trafficking) v Kent County Council

REFERRED in

• The King on the application of ECPAT UK (Every Child Protected Against Trafficking) v Kent County Council

AFFIRMED in

• The King on the application of Kent County Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Halpenny Estate, Re, (1982) 41 N.R. 451 (SCC)
• R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings
• The Queen ota S v Wandsworth
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food



See all quotations

• Gillick (A.P.) v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and the Department of Health and Social Security (England)
• R (Miller and Another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union; Re McCord's application
• Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority
• R (JL) v Islington London Borough Council
• R v Islington London Borough Council, ex parte Rixon
• Immigration Act 2016
• Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Care Act 2014
• Housing Act 1985
• Children Act 1989
• Children and Social Work Act 2017
• Local Authority Social Services Act 1970
• Equality Act 2010
• Immigration Act 1971
• Local Government and Housing Act 1989
• Care Standards Act 2000
• Housing Act 1996
• The Contracts for Difference (Electricity Supplier Obligations) Regulations 2014
• The Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010
• R (on the applications of Hooper, Withey, Naylor and Martin) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• R (G) v Barnet London Borough Council; R (W) v Lambeth London Borough Council; R (A) v Same
• R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council
• R (G) v London Borough of Southwark
• Human Rights Act 1998
• R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re T (A Child)