The King on the application of the Duke of Sussex v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Planning Act 2008 - Articles : S-5
• Mental Health Act 1983 - Articles : S-118
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-31

[See more]

• Maidstone and Malling Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2001

CONSIDERS

• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• JA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R Talpada v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Jobarteh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• The King (on the application of the Good Law Project) v The Prime Minister
• R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the Application of HZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Transport (Heathrow Airport Ltd, interested party)
• R (on the application of Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• R X v London Borough of Tower Hamlets
• Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
• Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another
• The Queen (on the application of The Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office
• The King (on the application of British Gas Trading Ltd) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
• Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council
• The Queen (on the application of Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v P. Borough Council, ex parte S
• R Manchester Airports Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
• R (on the application of Badmus and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mohammed Ali Raja v London Borough of Redbridge
• DSD and NBV v The Parole Board of England and Wales
• Re Findlay
• R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
• R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council
• S (Omission from judgment: Duty of counsel)

REFERS TO

• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman
• R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg

[See more]

• Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
• Re Findlay
• R v P. Borough Council, ex parte S
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• S (Omission from judgment: Duty of counsel)
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R X v London Borough of Tower Hamlets
• Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another
• JA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Jobarteh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council
• DSD and NBV v The Parole Board of England and Wales
• R Talpada v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council
• Mohammed Ali Raja v London Borough of Redbridge
• R Manchester Airports Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
• The Queen (on the application of The Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office
• R (on the application of Badmus and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Transport (Heathrow Airport Ltd, interested party)
• R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of the Good Law Project) v The Prime Minister
• The King on the Application of HZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of British Gas Trading Ltd) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• R (Plantagenet Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Justice and Others [2103] EWHC B13 (Admin)

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• DSD and NBV v The Parole Board of England and Wales
• R (AH and Others (Sudan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)
• R Jobarteh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• S (Omission from judgment: Duty of counsel)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman
• Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council
• Secretary of State for Education and Science v Metropolitan Borough Council of Tameside
• R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• Re Findlay
• R X v London Borough of Tower Hamlets
• Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd and Another
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
• R v P. Borough Council, ex parte S
• JA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Plantagenet Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Justice and Others [2103] EWHC B13 (Admin)
• Planning Act 2008
• Mental Health Act 1983
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• R (M) v Ashworth Hospital Authority
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• R Talpada v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Citizens UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council
• Mohammed Ali Raja v London Borough of Redbridge
• Courts Act, 1981
• R Manchester Airports Holdings Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
• The Queen (on the application of The Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office
• R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Transport (Heathrow Airport Ltd, interested party)
• R (on the application of Badmus and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department