Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Agricultural Marketing Act 1958
• Agricultural Marketing Act 1931
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation

[See more]

• Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another
• Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 - Articles : S-19
• Conspiracy, and Protection of Property Act 1875 - Articles : S-9

REFERS TO

• R v Board of Education
• R v Mitchell. ex parte Livesey
• The King against The Steward and Suitors of The Manor of Havering Atte Bower

REVERSES

• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] UKHL J0214-1
• [1968] 1 All ER 694
• [1968] 2 WLR 924

[See more]

• [1968] AC 997

REFERRED in

• Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan
• Kerajaan Malaysia v Tay Chai Huat
• Hong Leong Equipment Sdn Bhd v Liew Fook Chuan & Other Appeals

[See more]

• Pendaftar Pertubuhan v Datuk Justine Jinggut
• Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Mohamed (formerly CC)
• Howell v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1st Defendant) Waveney Borough Council (2nd Defendant) Stamford Renewables Ltd (3rd Defendant)
• RE D for JR
• R Rob Evans v HM Attorney General The Information Commissioner (Interested Party)
• B.F. Burt and H.I. Burt v States of Jersey
• The King (on the application of West Coast Railway Company Ltd) v Office of Rail and Road
• Cumings v Bickenhead Corporation
• Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union
• McEldowney v Forde
• Digicel Ltd Claimant v The Telecommunications Regulatory Commission Defendant
• Vance Chitolie Claimant v (1) Attorney General of Saint Lucia (2) The Comptroller of Customs Defendant [ECSC]
• Hyman Joseph v Saint Lucia Air & Sea Ports Authority
• Jared Adams Applicant v The Commissioner of Police of the Royal Anguilla Police Force the Honourable Attorney General Respondents [ECSC]
• Lennox Linton Claimant v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda Defendant [ECSC]
• McEldowney v Forde

CONSIDERED in

• Timothy Charles Harris and Mrs. Angelika Harris v Broads Authority
• Stewart v Ronalds
• R (Brown and Others) v Governor of Belmarsh Prison and Others

[See more]

• TV Harrison CIC v Leeds City Council
• Jerrick v Greyhound & Harness Racing Regulatory Authority and Another
• R Liquid Leisure Ltd v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
• R Ali Abubakar Mohamed v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Colene Boskovic) v Chief Constable of Staffordshire Police
• Scott Henley-Smith v Secretary of State for Justice
• R v Attorney General and Another
• The Queen v Secretary of State for Education and Science ex parte Avon County Council
• The Queen (on the application of Emmanuel Carlos) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Braintree District Council ex parte Malcolm William Halls
• Chandler v Camden London Borough Council
• Director of Legal Aid Casework v R Sunita Sisangia
• R Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Others Commissioners of Inland Revenue and Another
• R v The Treasury and the Bank of England and Another
• R (SRM Global Master Fund LP) v Commissioners of HM Treasury
• Independent Police Complaints Commission (R) v HM Coroner for Inner North London
• The Commissioners of Customs and Excise and Another
• YH (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen v Monopolies and Mergers Commission and Others
• R (Law Society of England and Wales) v Lord Chancellor
• R (Spink) v Wandsworth London Borough Council
• R (VC and Others) and Another v Newcastle City Council Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
• The Queen (on the application of Seth Kaitey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v AY
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v E
• The Queen (on the application of The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) v Natural England
• R (Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• R (Electoral Commission) v Westminster Magistrates' Court
• The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants v The President of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
• R Rights of Women v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
• Bristol District Council v Clark
• Jennifer Jane Ahluwalia née Haley (also known as Jennifer Haley) v The Employment and Social Security Committee
• "L1" (Claimant/Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Patel and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• Exide Technologies Ltd v The Attorney-General
• Chesterfields Preschools Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue & Others
• The Criminal Bar Association of New Zealand Incorporated v the Attorney-General
• The Attorney-General v Alan Parekura Torohina Haronga
• Reuters Homes Ltd v Wanganui District Council
• Woolley v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd
• R Christian Concern v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• Ryhurst Ltd v Whittington Health NHS Trust
• R (SPH Holdings Ltd) v City of York Council
• The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants v The President of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
• Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
• The Queen (on the application of British Telecommunications Plc) v HM Treasury
• The Queen (on the application of AR (A Child), by his litigation friend, MP) v The London Borough of Waltham Forest
• Vince and Another v Chief Constable of Dorset
• R (GC) and Another v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis
• Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v First Stop Wholesale Ltd
• R Craig Daniel ROGERS v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• TC v State of New South Wales
• Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
• The King on the Application of HZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Adrian John Bailey v Secretary of State for Justice
• Fire Brigades Union v HM Treasury
• The King (on the application of MS Helen Timson) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• R AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Salih) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Rahmani) v Same
• Gallaher Group Ltd and Others, R v The Competition and Markets Authority
• R v Warwickshire County Council ex parte Powergen Plc
• Refugee and Migrant Forum of Essex and London (“Ramfel”) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another
• Congreve v Home Office
• R Misick v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
• R (Quark Fishing Ltd) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 1)
• Boyce and Others v Judicial and Legal Services Commission
• Garcia v Minister Responsible for Immigration and Chief Immigration Officer
• Rambeharry v Ressouvenir Estates Ltd
• Baptiste v General Manager of Transport
• Camacho and Sons Ltd et Al v Collector of Customs
• Mahabir et Al v Airports Authority of Trinidad & Tobago
• R v The Director of Planning
• Charleau v Commissioner of Police, Morrison and Gray
• Paramount Betting Ltd v Attorney General and Collector General
• Mondesir Estates Ltd v The Development Control Authority The Attorney General
• Commission of Strata Corporation v Strata Appeals Tribunal
• Tommaso Barucca v Allied Health Professionals Council
• Hon. Mark Brantley v Constituency Boundaries Commission
• Pinneys Hotel Development Ltd v The Minister of Communications and Works et Al
• Francis v The Kingston Pilotage Authority and Another
• Dr. R D. Colman v The General Medical Council
• R v HM Treasury and the bank of England ex parte Centro-Com Srl
• The Queen (on the Application of Christian Concern) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Gorstew Ltd v The Contractor-General
• The Village Council of Craig Village District v Local Government Board
• The King (on the application of Wildfish Conservation) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
• McCormack v Garda Síochána Complaints Board
• The King (on the application of) Ms Helen Timson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Jamaicans for Justice v Police Service Commission and Attorney General
• The Queen (on the Application of All the Citizens) v Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
• Faith Webster v The Public Service Commission
• Arlene Elmarie Peterkin v Natural Resources Conservation Authority
• The Queen v Major
• Re K.C. Confectionary Ltd
• Yaseen et Al v Attorney-general et Al
• Re Tommy Crutchfield
• R (on the application of Williams) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Charley's Windsor House Ltd v Prime Minister and Minister of Defendant Economic Growth & Job Creation
• De Freitas (called Malik) v Benny
• R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
• R (on the application of Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office (Braintree District Council and Others, interested parties)
• Marshall v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Matthew McMillan v Alonzo Carty and Attorney General of Saint Kitts and Nevis
• The Queen v Mitchell et Al
• Everaldo Puck v Kareem Michael
• Trevor Isaac Paula Drakes v The Land Survey Board of Trinidad and Tobago
• Secretary of the Ministry of Health v The New South Wales Nurses and Midwives' Association
• British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd
• M v Home Office
• Brantley and Others v Constituency Boundaries Commission and Others (Saint Christopher and Nevis)
• Attorney General v K.C. Confectionery Ltd
• Pinneys Hotel Development Ltd v The Minister of Communications and Works et Al
• Matthew McMillan v Alonzo Carty
• Hon. Mark Brantley (in his personal capacity and as a representative of the Concerned Citizens Movement) v Constituency Boundaries Commission (being Mr. R.A. Peter Jenkins, Hon. Asim Martin, Hon. Marcella Liburd, Hon. Vance Amory, and Hon. Vincent Byron)
• J. Astaphan and Company (1970) Ltd) APPELLANT v Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica RESPONDENT [ECSC]
• Mondesir Estates Ltd v The Development Control Authority et Al
• Claude Skelton-Cline v The Cabinet of the Virgin Islands
• Muriel Thompson v The Public Service Commission
• Mrs Karen Louise Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council Mr Len Satchell (Interested Party)
• People United Respecting the Environment (Pure) et Al v Environmental Management Authority et Al
• Graham William Phillips v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
• Satish Chatwani and Others v The National Crime Agency and Another
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind
• Axis International Ltd Plaintiff v The Civil Aviation Authority of the Cayman Islands (Caaci) 1st Defendant Cayman Islands Helicopters Ltd 2nd Defendant
• Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Danielle Johnson
• The Commissioner of the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission v Diamond Quarry Inc., Baracara Quarries Inc.
• R (Bradley) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Suisse Security Bank and Trust Ltd v Francis
• Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No. 2)
• Anna Gonzalez v The Minister of National Security
• Jo and Ors v Secretary of State for Home Department (Section 55 duty) Nigeria
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Nemat Soltany v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Flight Sergeant (Ret'd) Barbara Eyton-Hughes v The Secretary of State for Defence
• R v Docherty
• Katwaroo v Burroughs and the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• R v DPP, ex parte Duckenfield and Another ; R v South Yorkshire Police Authority and Another, ex parte Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others
• R (on the application of DMA, AHK, BK and ELN) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• O'Reilly v Mackman
• Silly Creek Estate and Marina Company Ltd v Attorney General of Turks and Caicos Islands
• Annington Property Ltd v The Secretary of State for Defence
• R v London Boroughs Transport Committee, ex parte Freight Transport Association Ltd

FOLLOWED in

• Booi Kim Lee v Menteri Sumber Manusia and Another

CITED in

• R the Friends of Finsbury Park v Haringey London Borough Council Festival Republic Ltd and Another (Interested Parties) The Open Spaces Society (Intervenor)
• Blue Line Taxis (Newcastle) Ltd v The Council of the City of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
• LM's Application

[See more]

• The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis v Syed Talha Ahsan
• In the matter of an application by Patrick Stewart for Judicial Review
• R David Attfield v The London Borough of Barnet
• R (on the application of Ezz) v HM Treasury
• Re McMahon
• Chief Executive of Department of Labour v Yadegary and Another
• R (Ignaoua) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Rights of Women) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
• The Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
• Rainbow Insurance Company Ltd v The Financial Services Commission and Others (Mauritius)
• R v Gaming Board for Great Britain, ex parte Benaim and Khaida
• R BG v The Chief Constable of the West Midlands Constabulary (1st Defendant) Birmingham City Council (2nd Defendant)
• Ya'axch+® Conservation Trust v Sabido (Chief Forest Officer) and Others
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
• Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
• Zenus Williams Claimant v Police Service Commission Defendant
• Watt v Prime Minister and another
• Romaneta Francis Applicant v Public Utilities Authority Respondent [ECSC]
• R v DPP ex parte Kebeline
• M v Home Office
• A, X and Y and Others and Secretary of State for the Home Department
• M v Home Office
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Kaye and Another

RELIED UPON in

• 1. The Staff Side of the Police Negotiating Board and Others (First Claimants) v 1. Valerie Piper and Others (Second Claimants) Secretary of State for Work and Defendants Pensions & Hm Treasury & Others

COMMENTED in

• RM v Scottish Ministers
• Neville Cenac Claimant v The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendant [ECSC]

APPLIED in

• Sir Gerald Watt, Kcn, QC Appellant v [1] Prime Minister [2] Juno Samuel Respondents [ECSC]

This document cites

---

• Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
• The King against The Steward and Suitors of The Manor of Havering Atte Bower
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Mitchell. ex parte Livesey



See all quotations

• R v Board of Education
• Agricultural Marketing Act 1931
• Conspiracy, and Protection of Property Act 1875
• Agricultural Marketing Act 1958
• Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food