Congreve v Home Office
Linked as:
Extract
Congreve v Home Office
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
APPLIES
- Attorney General v Wilts United Dairies Ltd
- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
CONSIDERS
- Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 - Articles : S-1
- Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 - Articles : S-2
- Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949
CITED in
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Kaye and Another
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R v Toohey; ex parte Northern Land Council
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Herbage
- Williams v Home Office (No. 2)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- R v Permanent Secretary Ministry of Justice ex parte Lackston Robinson; Lackston Robinson v Daisy Coke, Michael Fennel, Edwin Jones, Pauline Findlay and George Philip (all members of the Public Service Commission [Consolidated proceedings]
- R William George Colley (Claimant/Appellant) The Council for Licensed Conveyancers The Discipline and Appeals Committee (Defendants/Respondents)
- Delta Merseyside Ltd v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Chong Kok Lim and Others v Yong Su Hian
- Chief Minister of the State of Sabah, The; Sugumar Balakrishnan
- Lo Hong Tan; President, District Council, Batu Pahat
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
DISTINGUISHED in
- A-G of Singapore; Dow Jones Publishing Company (Asia) Inc.
- R v Richmond London Borough Council ex parte McCarthy & Stone
APPLIED in
This document cites
