Neville Cenac Claimant v The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendant [ECSC]
Linked as:
Extract
Neville Cenac Claimant v The Attorney-General of Saint Lucia Defendant [ECSC]
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Inter Kellet & auter le Case fuit que un seisi de 3. acres per several feoffments
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
CITES
- Eastman Photographic Materials Company, Ltd, v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks
- Ex parte Todd. Re Ashcroft
- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
[See more]
COMMENTS
- Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
CONSIDERS
- Bankruptcy Act 1883 - Articles : S-47
- Bankruptcy Act 1869 - Articles : S-91
- Agricultural Marketing Act 1958
This document cites
- Julius v The Lord Bishop of Oxford and Another
- Eastman Photographic Materials Company, Ltd, v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks
- Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
- Inter Kellet & auter le Case fuit que un seisi de 3. acres per several feoffments
