Hall and Others v Mayor of London (on Behalf of the Greater London Authority)
Linked as:
Extract
Hall and Others v Mayor of London (on Behalf of the Greater London Authority)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
- Asher and Wife v Whitlock
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Forestry Act 1967
- Manchester Airport Plc v Dutton and Others (Defendants/Applicants)
- Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
[See more]
FOLLOWS
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
REVERSES
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
DISTINGUISHED in
CITED in
- The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow v David Frank Devere
- Muldoon v Melbourne City Council
- West Sussex County Council v Persons Unknown (First Defendant) Shaun Christopher O'Donnell (Second Defendant) Gary Sherborne (Third Defendant) Pamela Lucas (Fourth Defendant)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Sun Street Property Ltd v Persons Unknown (Defendants/Applicants)
- The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington v Owen Kensley Jones and Others
- London Borough of Lambeth v Caul Grant
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Sheffield City Council v Alice Fairhall and Others
- UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc (2) Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Ltd (3) Magellan Petroleum (UK) Ltd (4) Horse Hill Developments Ltd (5) UKOG (GB) Ltd v Persons unknown Who are Protestors against the Exploration and/or Extraction of Mineral Oil or Relative Hydrocarbon or Natural Gas by the Claimant(s) and Who are Involved in the Following Acts or any of them:
- Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
[See more]
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
- Manchester Airport Plc v Dutton and Others (Defendants/Applicants)
- Birmingham City Council v Shafi and another
- Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail) Ltd