M v P (Queen's Proctor intervening)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-33
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895 - Articles : S-4
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-3

[See more]

• Summary Jurisdiction (Separation and Maintenance) Act 1925 - Articles : S-1
• Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 - Articles : S-5
• Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 - Articles : S-1
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-183
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 - Articles : S-9
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 - Articles : S-38
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-9
• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-6
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-8
• Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-57
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-10
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

REFERS TO

• Craig v Kanssen
• Np v Krp
• P. v P

[See more]

• Wiseman v Wiseman
• Dennis v Dennis
• Bater v Bater
• Re Rapisarda v Colladon; 180 Irregular Divorces
• Sofia Arif (Petitioner) v Arif Anwar Zar (First Respondent) Raziz Rehan (Second Respondent)
• Everitt v Everitt
• Woolfenden v Woolfenden
• Practice Direction (Divorce Registry: Lump Sum Award)
• Ebrahim v Ali (otherwise Ebrahim) and Queen's Proctor (Intervening)
• Krenge v Krenge
• Sergey Solovyev v Alexandra Solovyeva
• Walker v Walker
• Butler v Butler, The Queen's Proctor intervening
• F. v F
• El Fadl v El Fadl
• Batchelor v Batchelor
• Tibbles v SIG Plc (trading as Asphaltic Roofing Supplies)
• Meier v Meier
• Marco Lo Grasso v Surendra Naik Khalik Bhatoo and twenty other petitions (Third Party)
• Callaghan v Hanson-Fox and Another
• Crosland v Crosland
• Roult v North West Strategic Health Authority
• H v H (The Queen's Proctor Intervening) (Validity of Japanese Divorce)
• R v Tolson
• Manchanda v Manchanda
• Wright v Wright
• John Arthur Charles Gould
• Heydon's Case
• Rapisarda v Colladon
• Re F. (Infants) (Adoption Order: Validity)
• Marsh v Marsh
• Moynihan v Moynihan (Nos 1 and 2)
• P. v P. and J
• McPherson v McPherson
• Re Pritchard, decd.; Pritchard v Deacon
• Spawforth v Spawforth
• Kemp-Welch v Kemp-Welch
• Dryden v Dryden
• John O'Connor v George Alfred Isaacs and Others
• A and Others v HM Treasury (Application by Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2019] 2 Fam CR 489
• [2020] 1 All ER 147
• [2019] 3 WLR 273

[See more]

• [2019] FAM 431

CONSIDERED in

• X v Y
• Maria Gauquelin Des Pallieres v Bertrand Gauquelin Des Pallieres
• Somerset County Council v NHS Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group and Others

[See more]

• Nadeem Shahzad v Nusrat Mazher

CITED in

• Maria Gauquelin Des Pallieres v Bertrand Gauquelin Des Pallieres
• Nadeem Shahzad v Nusrat Mazher

This document cites

• Walker v Walker
• Rapisarda v Colladon
• Bernstein v Jackson
• P. v P
• Sergey Solovyev v Alexandra Solovyeva



See all quotations

• Sergey Solovyev v Alexandra Solovyeva
• John O'Connor v George Alfred Isaacs and Others
• John Arthur Charles Gould
• Re Pritchard, decd.; Pritchard v Deacon
• Wiseman v Wiseman
• Sofia Arif (Petitioner) v Arif Anwar Zar (First Respondent) Raziz Rehan (Second Respondent)
• Roult v North West Strategic Health Authority
• Re Rapisarda v Colladon; 180 Irregular Divorces
• Np v Krp
• Tibbles v SIG Plc (trading as Asphaltic Roofing Supplies)
• Ebrahim v Ali (otherwise Ebrahim) and Queen's Proctor (Intervening)
• Batchelor v Batchelor
• Re F. (Infants) (Adoption Order: Validity)
• H v H (The Queen's Proctor Intervening) (Validity of Japanese Divorce)
• Woolfenden v Woolfenden
• Marsh v Marsh
• Everitt v Everitt
• Craig v Kanssen
• Bater v Bater
• Butler v Butler, The Queen's Proctor intervening
• El Fadl v El Fadl
• Crossland v Crossland
• R v Tolson
• Dryden v Dryden
• Callaghan v Hanson-Fox and Another
• Wright v Wright
• Moynihan v Moynihan (Nos 1 and 2)
• Dennis v Dennis
• McPherson v McPherson
• Crosland v Crosland