John O'Connor v George Alfred Isaacs and Others

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Beaurain, Gent, v Right Hon Sir W. Scott
• Clark v Woods, Smith, and Cooper
• Read v Brown

[See more]

• Ackerley v Parkinson and another
• Board of Trade v Cayzer, Irvine & Company
• Douglas and Another, Assignees of Stein and Smith, Bankrupts, v Forrestt, Executor of James Hunter
• Monckton v Payne
• Crepps v Durden
• Pease and Others against Henry Chaytor, Esquire, and Another
• R v Lancashire Justices, ex parte Tyrer
• Gelen v Hall
• West Riding of Yorkshire Rivers Board v Robinson Brothers
• Houlden v Smith
• Coburn v Colledge
• Everett v Griffiths
• Hodson v Cooke
• Morgan against Hughes
• Kirby v Simpson
• Tinkham v Perry
• Brittain v Kinnaird and Another
• Gray against Cookson and Clayton
• Matthew Taylor against Robert William Milnes Nesfield, Esq
• R v Lancashire Justices, ex parte Tyrer
• Sommerville v William Mirehouse and Another, Esquires
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Caledonian Insurance Company v Gilmour
• R v Swindon Local Board
• Cooke v Gill
• Scott v Avery
• Musurus Bey v Gadban

CONSIDERS

• Fortifications. Act 1709
• Limitation Act 1623
• Justices Protection Act 1848

[See more]

• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895
• Justices Protection (Ireland) Act 1849
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-21
• Justices Protection Act 1848 - Articles : S-II
• Justices Protection Act 1848 - Articles : S-III
• Justices Protection Act 1848 - Articles : S-XIII
• Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 - Articles : S-1
• Affiliation Orders Act 1914 - Articles : S-1
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895 - Articles : S-4
• Limitation Act 1939
• Public Authorities Protection Act 1893

APPLIES

• Haylock v Sparke
• Polley v Fordham

CONSIDERED in

• Radivojevic v L.R Industries Ltd
• The Adoption Act 1958 and Another
• Sarah Hipperson v the Chief Constable of the Ministry of Defence Police and Others

[See more]

• Francis Charles Hyland v Chief Constable of the Lancashire Constabulary
• Toyota Finance Australia Ltd v Dennis and Others; Tekitu Pty Ltd v Dennis and Another
• Vasilj Ceric v CE Heath Underwriting and Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd [NTR]
• London Congregational Union Incorporated v Harriss & Harriss
• The General Tire & Rubber Company (Respondents (Plaintiffs) v The Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company Ltd & Others (Appellants
• HM Attorney-General at the relation of Co-operative Retail Services Ltd (Plaintiff) v Borough Council of Taff Ely (First Defendants) (Respondants) Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons (South Wales) Ltd (Second Defendants) Mid-Glamorgan County Council (Third Defendants) Tesco Stores Ltd (Fourth Defendants)
• Michael Firman (Plaintiff v Miss Diane Ellis (Defendant
• R v Newbury District Council (First Respondent) Newbury and District Agricultural Society (Second Respondent) ex parte and Another
• John Dunlop v HM Customs & Excise
• State of Nsw v Mulcahy
• Reid v Sylvester and Attorney General
• Ebanks v Crooks and Another
• Jones v Osadebay et Al
• General Tire & Rubber Company v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company Ltd
• Raeburn v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• McDONALD v Bord na gCon & AG
• Chagos Islanders v Attorney General and Another

REFERRED in

• Wild v Wild
• R v Manchester City Magistrates' Court, ex parte Davies
• Public Finance Bhd v Soo Hock Siong

[See more]

• Eng Chong How and Another; Koay Tuan and Another
• United Malayan Banking Corporation Bhd v Syarikat Perumahan Luas Sdn Bhd (No 2)
• Firman v Ellis
• London Congregational Union Inc. v Harriss & Harriss
• Re F. (Infants) (Adoption Order: Validity)
• Awoyomi v Radford and Another
• M v P (Queen's Proctor intervening)
• Re McC. (A Minor)
• The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukkaram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad and Others (Defendants/Interpleader Claimants) National Westminster Bank Plc (Defendant/Stakeholder)

FOLLOWED in

• Ng Kook Kin v PP

COMMENTED in

• TETT v STATES of JERSEY [Royal Ct]

CITED in

• Panton v Robinson
• Panton v Robinson
• Gillette v Glasford and Benn

[See more]

• Attorney General v Jones
• Cartledge v E. Jopling & Sons Ltd
• Cartledge v E. Jopling & Sons Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1956] 120 JP 325
• [1956] 2 All ER 417
• [1956] 3 WLR 172

[See more]

• [1956] 2 QB 288

This document cites

• Musurus Bey v Gadban
• Ackerley v Parkinson and another
• Hodson v Cooke
• Morgan against Hughes
• West Riding of Yorkshire Rivers Board v Robinson Brothers



See all quotations

• Tinkham v Perry
• Gray against Cookson and Clayton
• Gelen v Hall
• Kirby v Simpson
• R v Lancashire Justices, ex parte Tyrer
• Clark v Woods, Smith, and Cooper
• Matthew Taylor against Robert William Milnes Nesfield, Esq
• Scott v Avery
• Polley v Fordham
• Douglas and Another, Assignees of Stein and Smith, Bankrupts, v Forrestt, Executor of James Hunter
• Caledonian Insurance Company v Gilmour
• Houlden v Smith
• Sommerville v William Mirehouse and Another, Esquires
• Crepps v Durden
• Haylock v Sparke
• Everett v Griffiths
• Board of Trade v Cayzer, Irvine & Company
• Beaurain, Gent, v Right Hon Sir W. Scott
• Pease and Others against Henry Chaytor, Esquire, and Another
• Monckton v Payne
• Coburn v Colledge
• Cooke v Gill
• R v Lancashire Justices, ex parte Tyrer
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Read v Brown
• R v Swindon Local Board
• Brittain v Kinnaird and Another
• Solicitors Act 1843
• Copyright Act 1709
• Limitation Act 1623