Akumah v Hackney London Borough Council
Linked as:
Extract
Akumah v Hackney London Borough Council
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council
- Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
- Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
REFERS TO
- Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
- Wheeldon v Burrows
- Shelley v London County Council. Harcourt v London County Council
[See more]
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-21
- Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-111
- Road Traffic Act 1991 - Articles : S-66
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R (Kilby) v Basildon District Council
- R (on the application of Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice
- R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Health
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- Corporation of Hamilton v Attorney-General and the Centre for Justice
- Corporation of Hamilton v Attorney-General [SC Civ (Bda)]
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
- Arthur and Another v Anker
- Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
- Sovmots Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment; Brompton Securities Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
- Vine v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
- Akumah v Hackney London Borough Council