Burford v Durkin (HMIT)

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Burford v Durkin (HMIT)

DISTINGUISHES

• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd

REFERS TO

• Horder v Scott
• Craven (HM Inspector of Taxes) v White; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Bowater Property Developments Ltd; Baylis (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Gregory
• R v Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Cottrell & Rothon

[See more]

• Agricultural, Horticultural and Forestry Industry Training Board v Aylesbury Mushrooms Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Honig v Sarsfield

AFFIRMS

• Burford v Durkin (HMIT)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1991] BTC 9
• 63 TC 645
• 31/10/1990 Times Law Reports

[See more]

• [1991] STC 7

CITED in

• Re McGuckian (No 1)
• TC03554: Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co) (A Firm)

CONSIDERED in

• Courts Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Courts Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• Geoffrey Cheesman Trading as Well in Tune v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

[See more]

• Republic Bank (EC) Ltd v Director of Finance and Planning

This document cites

• Craven (HM Inspector of Taxes) v White; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Bowater Property Developments Ltd; Baylis (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Gregory
• Honig v Sarsfield
• R v Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Cottrell & Rothon
• Horder v Scott
• Burford v Durkin (HMIT)



See all quotations

• Agricultural, Horticultural and Forestry Industry Training Board v Aylesbury Mushrooms Ltd
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd
• Finance Act 1975
• Taxes Management Act 1970
• Customs and Excise Act 1952
• Finance (No. 2) Act 1975
• Income Tax (Sub-Contractors in the Construction Industry) Regulations 1975
• Commissioner for Local Administration in Scotland (Expenses) Regulations 1975