Cannonier v DPP; Isaac and Others v DPP

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Ernest Lockhart v The Queen
• Benedetto v The Queen (No 2)
• Criminal Appeal Act 1968

[See more]

• Human Rights Act 1998
• Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Sankar (Lawrence) v The State

CITES

• R v Vye ; R v Wise ; R v Stephenson
• State of Trinidad and Tobago v Boyce

[See more]

• Barrow v The Queen
• Thompson v The Queen
• Mitchell (David) v R
• Crosdale v The Queen
• R v Azam; R v Altaf; R v Hussain
• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• Porter v Magill
• David Shields Montgomery (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents) Andrew Alexander Marshall Coulter (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents)
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• R v Walters
• R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman
• R v Medway
• R v Gray ; R v Liggins ; R v Rowlands ; R v Ridings
• R v Jones (Brian)
• R v Devonport
• R v Platten
• Pringle v The Queen
• R v Dougal
• Daniel Dick Trimmingham v The Queen
• Tripodi v R
• Porter v Magill
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
• Sankar v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• JAMES McAULAY ANDERSON v HM ADVOCATE
• Tido v R

APPLIES

• Tido v R
• Daniel Dick Trimmingham v The Queen
• Thompson v R

[See more]

• R (Kenneally) v Snaresbrook Crown Court; R (on the application of Kenneally) v Rampton Hospital Authority
• Jagdeo Singh v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Michel v the Queen
• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• De Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing
• R v Weir (Michael Clive)
• Darmalingum v Mauritius

DISTINGUISHES

• State of Trinidad and Tobago v Boyce
• R v Sullivan (Colin Thomas)
• Barnes, Desquottes and Johnson v R, Scott and Walters v R

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Twynham

REFERS TO

• Judgment Nº CCPR/C/35/D/210/1986 from United Nations of Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, 06-04-1989
• Pollard v The Queen
• Monnell & Morris v United Kingdom

[See more]

• R v King (Ashley)

FOLLOWS

• Nankissoon Boodram, Ramsingh (Joel), Ramiah (Joey), Ramkalawan Singh, Sankeralli (Russell), Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2012] 5 LRC 381

FOLLOWED in

• R v Lovelace

CONSIDERED in

• R v Rambarran
• Rambarran v The Queen
• Jonathan Armbrister v R

[See more]

• Armbrister v R