Benedetto v The Queen (No 2)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Islington London Borough Council v Harridge
• Vasquez v The Queen

REFERS TO

• R v Forbes (Anthony Leroy)
• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall
• R v Bailey

[See more]

• R v Burge ; R v Pegg

CONSIDERS

• Judicial Committee (General Appellate Jurisdiction) Rules Order 1982
• Criminal Appeal Act 1966 - Articles : S-5
• Criminal Appeal Act 1968

[See more]

• Criminal Appeal Act 1907 - Articles : S-9
• Pringle v The Queen

APPLIES

• R v Gooch

CITES

• R v Lattimore
• R v Donald Pendleton
• Williams (Cardinal) v R

[See more]

• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• R v Edwards (Maxine)
• Randall v R
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Sales
• R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Pearson
• Randall (Barry) v R
• R v Turnbull
• Vasquez v R; O'Neil v R

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Makanjuola ; R v Easton

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Beckford
• Teper v The Queen

CITED in

• Lord Advocate, Petitioner
• Brown v The State
• Andrew Milton Appellant v The Queen Respondent

[See more]

• Knowles v Knowles (Antigua and Barbuda)
• Huggins and Others v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)
• Panday v Virgil (Senior Superintendent of Police)

CONSIDERED in

• Beacher v R
• Jason Lawrence v The Queen
• Stephen Thomas Hudson v The Queen

[See more]

• Pahau v R Coa
• Pickering v R
• Waa v R
• Havalunga Pahulu v R Coa
• Darryl Frett v The Commissioner of Police
• Darryl Frett v The Commissioner of Police
• Cannonier v DPP; Isaac and Others v DPP
• Jermaine Missick v R
• Jahvid Absolam v R
• Marisa D. Mason Smith v Bahamas Power and Light Company Ltd
• Steeve Santana v R
• The King v Mikhail Gomes
• Kevol Brown v R
• Omar Anderson v R
• The King v Mikhail Gomes
• Kayjohn Daley v R
• Tyrone Headley v R
• Jerome Dixon v R
• Ryan McLean Richard Gordon v R Christopher Counsel
• Tiano D'Haiti v R
• Craig Dubidath v R
• Anderson Ryan Ince v The Queen
• Rayon Williams v R
• Sadiki Heslop v R
• Tiano D'Haiti v R
• Jarvis Small v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Maharaj and Others v The State
• Oneil Sheckleford v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 07/04/2003 Daily Cases
• (2003) 62 WIR 63
• [2003] 4 LRC 382

[See more]

• VG 2003 PC 1
• [2003] Crim LR 880
• [2003] 2 CrAppR 25
• [28/04/2003] TLR 1
• [2004] 1 WLR 500

APPLIED in

• Cannonier v DPP Isaac and Others v DPP

REFERRED in

• Patrick Lovelace Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Stubbs v The Queen
• Panday v Virgil (Senior Superintendent of Police)

[See more]

• Maharaj and Others v The State

This document cites

---

• R v Lucas (Ruth)
• R v Burge ; R v Pegg
• R v Makanjuola ; R v Easton
• R v Donald Pendleton
• R v Sales



See all quotations

• R v Turnbull
• R v Lattimore
• R v Forbes (Anthony Leroy)
• McConville and Others v Barclays Bank and Others
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Edwards (Maxine)
• R v Beckford
• Vasquez v R; O'Neil v R
• Randall (Barry) v R
• Islington London Borough Council v Harridge
• Alexander von Starck v The Queen
• Vasquez v The Queen
• Teper v The Queen
• Pringle v The Queen
• R v Bailey
• Williams (Cardinal) v R
• Randall v R
• R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Pearson
• R v Gooch
• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Criminal Appeal Act 1966
• Judicial Committee Act 1833
• Judicial Committee Act 1843
• Criminal Appeal Act 1968