Bonzel v Intervention Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERED in

• Nodeco Ltd v Texas Iron Works Inc.
• Ivax Pharmaceuticals (UK) Ltd v Kaisha
• Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech, Inc.

[See more]

• Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd v Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) Gmbh
• Merz Pharma GmbH & Company KGaA v Allergan Inc.
• Monsanto Company and Others v Merck & Company Inc. and Another
• Fosroc International Ltd v W.R Grace & Co-Conn
• Smithkline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (Disclosure of Documents); Apotex Europe Ltd v Beecham Group Plc
• Storage Computer Corporation and Another v Hitachi Data Systems Ltd
• M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd v Trek 2000 International Ltd
• Wobben v Vestas-Celtic Wind Technology Ltd
• University of Queensland v Siemens Magnet Technology Ltd
• Select Healthcare (uk) Ltd (Claimant) Cromptons Healthcare Ltd Proto Magic Innovations Ltd (Defendants)
• Texas Instruments Incorporated (Plaintiff) Hyundai Electronics Uk Ltd (Defendant)
• Oxford Gene Technology Ltd (Claimant/Respondent) Affymetrix Inc. and Another (3) Beckman Coulter Inc. (Defendants/Appellants)
• Ferag Ag v Muller Martini Ltd
• Mölnycke Healthcare AB v Wake Forest University and Another
• Nicocigs Ltd v Fontem Holdings 1 BV (a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands)
• Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corporation) (a company incorporated under the laws of Finland) v Ipcom Gmbh & Company KG (a company incorporated under the laws of Germany)
• Cartonneries De Thulin SA v CTP White Knight Ltd
• HTC Corporation v Yozmot
• Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Others v Istituto Gentili SpA and Another
• Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Medinol Ltd
• Optis Cellular Technology LLC v Apple Retail UK Ltd
• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Ltd
• Swarovski-Optik KG v Leica Camera AG and Another
• Qualcomm Incorporated (A Delaware Corporation) v Nokia Corporation (A Finnish Company)
• Saint-Gobain v 3M
• Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and Another
• European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc.
• European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc.
• The Department of Education and Skills v Frontline Technology Ltd
• Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc.
• Buhler AG v FP Spomax SA
• Varian Medical Systems International AG v Elekta Ltd and Another
• HTC Corporation v Gemalto S.A.
• NAB v Serco Ltd and Another
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)
• 1. Cosmetic Warriors Ltd and Another v 1. Amazon.Company UK Ltd and Another
• Associated Newspapers Ltd v His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales
• Monsanto Technology LLC v Cargill International SA (No 2)
• AGA Medical Corporation (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v Occlutech (UK) Ltd (Defendant/Part 20 Claimant)
• Generics [UK] Ltd trading as Mylan v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd and Another
• Philip Morris Products, SA v Rai Strategic Holdings, Inc.
• Gedeon Richter Plc (A Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Hungary) v Bayer Pharma AG (A Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Germany)
• Interdigital Technology Corporation v Lenovo Group Ltd
• Datacard Corporation v Eagle Technologies Ltd
• Dendron GmbH and Others v Regents of the University of California (Boston Scientific Ltd, Part 20 claimant)
• Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Company KG v Scott (t/a Scotts Potato Machinery)
• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Inc.
• Ap Racing Ltd (Claimant/Appellant) v Alcon Components Ltd
• A Ward Attachments Ltd v Fabcon Engineering Ltd
• Asahi Medical Company Ltd v Macopharma (UK) Ltd
• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Abbott Diabetes Care Incorporated and Others v Dexcom Incorporated and Others
• Medimmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd and Another
• Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• Pharmacia Corporation v Merck & Company Inc.
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• Facebook Ireland Ltd (a company incorporated in Ireland) v Voxer IP LLC (a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware)
• Dyson Technology Ltd v Samsung Gwangju Electronics
• Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) (Claimant/ Appellant) v IPcom GMBH & Company KG (Defendant/ Respondent)
• SmithKline Beecham Plc v Generics UK Ltd
• Research in Motion UK Ltd v (1) Inpro Licensing SARL and T-Mobile (UK) Ltd
• Medinol Ltd v Abbott Ireland and Others
• Gilead Sciences Inc. (a company registered in the US State of Delaware) v Nucana Plc
• Modernatx, Inc. v Pfizer Ltd
• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Glaxo Group Ltd v Patents Act
• Athene Holding Ltd v Imran Siddiqui, Stephen Cernich and Caldera Holdings Ltd
• Lilly Icos Ltd v Pfizer Ltd

REFERRED in

• Unwired Planet International Ltd v huawei Technologies Company, Ltd and Others Unwired Planet, Inc. Unwired Planet LLC (Ninth Party) Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Tenth Party Eleventh Party)
• IPCOM GMBH & Company KG v HTC Europe Company Ltd and Others
• Winthrop Pharmaceuticals (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Astrazeneca UK Ltd

[See more]

• Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.v v Nintendo of Europe GmbH
• Meter-Tech LLC and Another v British Gas Trading Ltd
• Philip Morris Products S.A. v Nicoventures Trading Ltd

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd

NOT APPLIED in

• Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd and another (Claimant/Part 20 Defendants) v Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University (Defendant/Part 20 Claimant)

CITED in

• Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen Gmb H v Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd
• J.C. Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd
• Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Richardson-Vicks Inc.; Smith Kline Beecham v Richardson-Vicks Inc.

[See more]

• SmithKline Beecham Biologicals S.A. v Connaught Laboratories Inc.

APPLIED in

• Manvers Engineering Ltd and Another v Lubetech Industries Ltd and Others
• Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech Inc.

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1991 RPC 231

FOLLOWED in

• Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Company, Ltd and Others Unwired Planet, Inc. and Others (Tenth Party) Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Eleventh Party)
• Synthon B.v v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd