Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• SmithKline Beecham Plc's (Paroxetine Anhydrate) Patent
• Draco AB's SPC Application

[See more]

• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Tamglass Ltd Oy v Luoyang North Glass Technology Company Ltd
• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Cipla Ltd v Glaxo Group Ltd
• Inhale Therapeutic Systems Inc. v Quadrant Healthcare Plc
• Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v Pike Signals Ltd
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Inc.
• R (BV) v Licensing Authority
• Palmaz's European Patents (UK)
• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent
• Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• Novartis v Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
• Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Richardson-Vicks Inc.; Smith Kline Beecham v Richardson-Vicks Inc.
• Parmenter v Cressey
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-2
• Patents Act 1977

CONSIDERED in

• Saertex France Sas v Hexcel Reinforcements UK Ltd (formerly Formax (UK) Ltd)
• HTC Europe Company Ltd v Apple Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of the State of California)
• Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH

[See more]

• Gareth Kevin Glass and Others v freyssinet Ltd
• Meter-Tech LLC and Another v British Gas Trading Ltd
• H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)

REFERRED in

• Siemens AG v Seagate Technology (Ireland)

CITED in

• Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Others
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Autostore Technology as v Ocado Group Plc

This document cites

• Novartis v Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Inc.
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV



See all quotations

• R (BV) v Licensing Authority
• SmithKline Beecham Plc's (Paroxetine Anhydrate) Patent
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Cipla Ltd v Glaxo Group Ltd
• Parmenter v Cressey
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• Palmaz's European Patents (UK)
• Murad & Foo v Perbadanan Pembangunan Pulau Pinang; Ong Chin Lee
• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent
• Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Richardson-Vicks Inc.; Smith Kline Beecham v Richardson-Vicks Inc.
• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Inhale Therapeutic Systems Inc. v Quadrant Healthcare Plc
• Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v Pike Signals Ltd
• Draco AB's SPC Application
• Tamglass Ltd Oy v Luoyang North Glass Technology Company Ltd
• Patents Act 1977
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• BASF AG v Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom (BIE).
• Farmitalia Carlo Erba Srl.
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products
• Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action relating to proprietary medicinal products
• Council Directive 81/851/EEC of 28 September 1981 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to veterinary medicinal products
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties