Research in Motion UK Ltd v (1) Inpro Licensing SARL and T-Mobile (UK) Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Fujitsu Ltd's Application
• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd

[See more]

• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Company Ltd
• Catnic Components Ltd and Another v Hill and Smith Ltd
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-14

CONSIDERED in

• Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd; Macrossan's Patent Application (No.0314464.9)
• Research in Motion UK Ltd v (1) Inpro Licensing SARL and T-Mobile (UK) Ltd
• Re Cappellini & Bloomberg

[See more]

• Commscope Technologies LLC v Solid Technologies, Inc.
• Sycurio Ltd (formerly Semafone Ltd) v PCI-PAL Plc
• Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd; Macrossan's Patent Application (No.0314464.9)

CITED in

• Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Merrell Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Others

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Research in Motion UK Ltd v (1) Inpro Licensing SARL and T-Mobile (UK) Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2006 RPC 20

REFERRED in

• Commscope Technologies LLC v Solid Technologies, Inc.

This document cites

• R. v. Robicheau (M.D.), (2002) 289 N.R. 217 (SCC)
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Catnic Components Ltd and Another v Hill and Smith Ltd
• CFPH LLC's Applications
• Halliburton Energy Services Inc. v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd



See all quotations

• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• Shopalotto.com Ltd's Application
• Crawford's Application
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others
• Fujitsu Ltd's Application
• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Company Ltd
• Fujitsu Ltd's Application
• Patents Act 1977
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998