Saint-Gobain v 3M

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S. (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)
• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)
• The Persons Identified in Schedule 1 of the Claim Form (the “SL Claimants”) v Tesco Plc

[See more]

• Lilly Icos Ltd v Pfizer Ltd
• Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA in its capacity as trustee of the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust (Claimant) Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Defendant) Grant Thornton UK LLP and Others (Respondents)
• Tibbles v SIG Plc (trading as Asphaltic Roofing Supplies)
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• NAB v Serco Ltd and Another
• J.C. Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd

REFERRED in

• Saint-Gobain v 3M

This document cites

• Lilly Icos Ltd v Pfizer Ltd
• Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA in its capacity as trustee of the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust (Claimant) Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Defendant) Grant Thornton UK LLP and Others (Respondents)
• Tibbles v SIG Plc (trading as Asphaltic Roofing Supplies)
• NAB v Serco Ltd and Another
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd



See all quotations

• The Persons Identified in Schedule 1 of the Claim Form (the “SL Claimants”) v Tesco Plc
• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S. (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)
• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)
• J.C. Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd