Rondel v Worsley

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Pippin and Wife v Sheppard
• Robinson v Behan
• Swinfen v Swinfen

[See more]

• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Clayton v Woodman & Son (Builders) Ltd
• Hargreaves v Bretherton
• Marrinan v Vibart
• Scott v Stansfield
• Groom v Crocker
• Bean v Wade
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• R v Southampton Justices, ex parte Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Note); R v Isle of Wight Justices - see R v Southampton Justices (Note)
• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Medical Act 1858
• Medical Act 1886
• Leslie v Ball

[See more]

• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
• Re Le Brasseur and Oakley
• Kennedy v Broun and Wife
• Fell v Brown
• Swinfen v Lord Chelmsford

REFERS TO

• Henderson v Elizabeth Broomhead
• Veley and Another against Burder
• Candler v Crane, Christmas & Company

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Rondel v Worsley

APPLIES

• Perring v Rebutter

CITES

• Hunter v Hanley
• More v Weaver
• William Purves, - Appellant; William Landell, - Respondent

[See more]

• Clark v Kirby-Smith
• Clayton v Woodman & Son (Builders) Ltd
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby (in Error)

CONSIDERED in

• R v Parmjit Singh
• Steven Paul Muscat v Nicholas Haider
• R v Parmjit Singh

[See more]

• Marlow, Michael John Kelly, Shane Leslie v R
• R v Johnson
• Man B & W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd and Another v Pt Bumi International Tankers
• Application by Garry Zane Glasby pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
• DEF v Scott Trappett
• Sankar v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Acton v Graham Pearce & Company (A Firm)
• Then Khek Khoon v Arjun Permanand Samtani
• Business Computers International Ltd v Registrar of Companies
• T.A. Picot (C.I.) Ltd and Vekaplast Windows (C.I.) Ltd v Michel, Crill and Hamon (Trading as Crills)
• Picot (T A) (CI) Ltd v Michel Crill & Hamon (practising as Crills)
• HM Attorney General v Philip Cowan Sinel and Steven Michael James Chiddicks
• Lai v Chamberlains
• Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago
• Kelley v Corston
• Moo Young (Gloria) and Erle Moo Young v Geoffrey Chong, Dorothy Chong and Family Foods Ltd ((in Liquidation))
• Orchard v South Eastern Electricity Board
• Hosein's Construction v 3G Technologies
• Symonette v the Government of the Bahamas et Al
• Somasundaram v M. Julius Melchoir & Company
• Husbands v Warefact Ltd
• W. v Ireland (No. 2)
• McMULLEN v KENNEDY T/A GILES J KENNEDY & Company SOLICITORS
• Summary of Eugene Leacock Appellant v Lorna Griffith Respondent
• Jennifer Moraldo v Kenneth O'Brien
• D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
• Belgravia International Bank & Trust Company Ltd and Experta Trust Company (Bahamas) Ltd v CIBC Trust Company Ltd; CIBC Trust Company (Bahamas) Ltd v Belgravia International Bank & Trust Company Ltd and Experta Trust Company (Bahamas) Ltd
• Dorsette v Attorney General et Al
• Juliet Rosales v Judy Thomas
• National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others
• Between: (1) Arnage Holdings Ltd (2) Brooklands Holdings Ltd (3) East Farthing Holdings Ltd (4) Ms Katia Rabello (5) Mr Fernando Toledo Plaintiffs v Walkers (A Firm) Defendant
• Saif Ali v Sydney Mitchell & Company
• Arnage Holdings Ltd v Walkers (A Firm)

REFERRED in

• Duncan Stevenson Macmillan v A. W. Knott Becker Scott Ltd
• Arenson v Arenson
• R B and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another

[See more]

• Palacath Ltd v Flanagan
• Mitchells (A Firm) v Funkwerk Information Technologies York Ltd
• PHILIPPA Carol Richardson v (1) Christopher MORTON (2) EATON Evans & Morris
• Re Sharpe; ex parte Donnelly
• Lewis v Ogden
• Thomas Miller & Company and Another v Richard Saunders & Partners
• Gwinnutt v George and another
• Ryeford Homes Ltd and Another v Sevenoaks District Council and Others
• Phillips v Symes (No. 3)
• Capital & Counties Plc v Hampshire County Council
• Hughes v National Union Mineworkers and Others
• Baker v Kaye
• Attorney General v British Broadcasting Corporation ; Same v Hat Trick Productions Ltd
• Malaysian Motor Insurance Pool (administered by MMIP Services Sdn Bhd) v Murali a/l Sandrakasan and Another
• Majlis Peguam Malaysia v Raja Segaran Krishnan
• O'K v DK (Witness: immunity)
• Re Sarflax Ltd
• Osman v Ferguson
• Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong and Another
• Public Trustee and Another v by Products Traders Pte Ltd and Others
• Pennington and Another v Crampton and Others
• Alexandrou v Oxford
• Al-Kandari v JR Brown & Company
• Palmer v Durnford Ford (A Firm)
• Kelly v London Transport Executive
• Simon Matthew Gwinnutt (as the First Respondent's Trustee in Bankruptcy) v Nicholas Frank Raymond George
• Abse v Smith
• Phillips v Symes (No. 3)
• Arenson v Arenson
• Awoyomi v Radford and Another
• Paulette Bailey et Al v Incorporated Lay Body of the Church in Jamaica and the Cayman islands in the Province of the West Indies
• McMullen v Clancy (No 2)
• Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
• Law Society of Singapore v Nor’ain bte Abu Bakar
• Guan Ming Hardware & Engineering Pte Ltd v Chong Yeo & Partners and Another
• Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP
• Sirros v Moore
• Sutcliffe v Thackrah
• Brooks v Metropolitan Police Commisioner
• O'K v DK (Witness: immunity)
• Phillips v Symes (Expert Witnesses: Costs)
• Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust
• Walpole v Partridge & Wilson (A Firm)
• Jones v Kaney
• Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Watson v Watson (Wasted Costs Orders)
• R v Legal Aid Board, ex parte Kaim Todner (A Firm)
• McLoughlin v O'Brian

CITED in

• Bott v Carter
• Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2)
• Guo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[See more]

• Mutual Life and Citizens' Assurance Company Ltd v Evatt
• COMPAGNIE NOGA DIMPORTATION Et DEXPORTATION SA and NESSIM D. GAON and 1) AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP Ltd and Mrs MARYAM ABACHA and Mr MOHAMMED SANI ABACHA as Personal Representatives of GENERAL SANI ABACHA deceased and CHIEF ANTHONY A. ANI
• Jaensch v Coffey
• Lai v Chamberlains
• Ward v McMaster and Others
• O'Coindealbhain v Gannon
• Bridget Byrne v Ryan
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons

APPLIED in

• Atwell v Perry & Company and Another
• Stanton and Another v Callaghan and Others
• Saif Ali v Sydney Mitchell & Company

[See more]

• Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire

FOLLOWED in

• BSN Commercial Bank (M) Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah, Mersing
• Syarikat Siaw Teck Hwa Realty and Developments Sdn Bhd v Malek and Joseph Au (sued as a firm)
• Lai Cheng Chong v PP

[See more]

• EC Controlled Demolitionsdn Bhd and Others; Kordial Kor d/o Kundang Singh
• Re Yap Peter
• J. Torrell and R Torrell (Née Clavero) v Pickersgill and Le Cornu (Practising as Pickersgill and Le Cornu)
• O'Reilly v Lee

DISTINGUISHED in

• Khoo Yew Boon; Miranda
• Mohd Nor Dagang Sdn Bhd v Tetuan Mohd Yusof Endut
• James (Oswald) v Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council (ex parte Oswald James)

[See more]

• Janin Caribbean Construction Ltd Appellant v [1] Ernest Clarence Wilkinson [2] Wilkinson, Wilkinson & Wilkinson Respondents [ECSC]

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1966] 3 All ER 657
• [1966] 3 WLR 950
• [1967] 1 QB 443

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Guan Ming Hardware & Engineering Pte Ltd v Chong Yeo & Partners and Another
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons

COMMENTED in

• Shields-Brodber (Kathryn) v Ralston Smith

APPROVED in

• Law Society of Ireland v Walker

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Rondel v Worsley

This document cites

---

• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby (in Error)
• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Clayton v Woodman & Son (Builders) Ltd
• Groom v Crocker



See all quotations

• Fell v Brown
• Candler v Crane, Christmas & Company
• Perring v Rebutter
• More v Weaver
• Robertson v MacDonogh
• Henderson v Elizabeth Broomhead
• Bean v Wade
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
• Howell against Young, Gent., one, &
• William Purves, - Appellant; William Landell, - Respondent
• Swinfen v Lord Chelmsford
• Scott v Stansfield
• Pippin and Wife v Sheppard
• Swinfen v Swinfen
• Hargreaves v Bretherton
• R v Southampton Justices, ex parte Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Note); R v Isle of Wight Justices - see R v Southampton Justices (Note)
• Clark v Kirby-Smith
• Marrinan v Vibart
• Kennedy v Broun and Wife
• Re Le Brasseur and Oakley
• Leslie v Ball
• Veley and Another against Burder
• Clayton v Woodman & Son (Builders) Ltd
• Hunter v Hanley
• Medical Act 1886
• Medical Act 1858