248 Cal.App.2d 493, 22986, San Francisco Examiner Division, Hearst Pub. Co. v. Sweat

Citation: 248 Cal.App.2d 493, 56 Cal.Rptr. 711

Opinion Judge: [10] Elkington

Party Name: San Francisco Examiner Division, Hearst Pub. Co. v. Sweat

Attorney: [7] Bishop, Murray & Barry, Richard S. Bishop, Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel and Alan A. Daugherty for Cross-complainant and Appellant. [8] Kiernan & Misciagna and E. P. Kiernan for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday February 14, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

248 Cal.App.2d 493, 22986, San Francisco Examiner Division, Hearst Pub. Co. v. Sweat

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 154 Cal. 420, Sac. 1529, Bradley v. F. Rosenthal, and Sunset Telephone and Telegraph Company (A Corporation)
California - 24 Cal.2d 200, 18805, Baugh v. Rogers
California - 37 Cal.2d 159, 21532, Popejoy v. Hannon
California - 42 Cal.2d 443, 22890, Thompson v. Lacey
California - 46 Cal.2d 423, 23225, Continental Cas. Co. v. Phoenix Constr. Co.

See all quotations