51 Cal.2d 127, 19977, City & County of S. F. v. Ho Sing

Citation: 51 Cal.2d 127, 330 P.2d 802

Opinion Judge: [10] Carter

Party Name: City & County of S. F. v. Ho Sing

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and George E. Baglin, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant. [8] Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Frank E. Farrella for Respondents.

Case Date: Friday October 24, 1958

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

51 Cal.2d 127, 19977, City & County of S. F. v. Ho Sing

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 161 U.S. 316 (1896), 40, Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of Columbia
Federal Cases - 67 U.S. 418 (1863), City Of Chicago v. Robbins
Federal Cases - 71 U.S. 657 (1867), Robbins v. City Of Chicago
Alabama - 167 So. 276 (Ala. 1936), 6 Div. 793, City of Tuscaloosa v. Fair
California - 132 Cal. 382, Sac. 774, Rider v. Clark

See all quotations

51 Cal.2d 127, 19977, City &amp; County of S. F. v. Ho Sing

51 Cal.2d 127, 19977, City & County of S. F. v. Ho Sing