205 Cal.App.2d 398, 10514, City of Sacramento v. Superior Court In and For Sacramento County

Citation: 205 Cal.App.2d 398, 23 Cal.Rptr. 43

Opinion Judge: [11] Pierce

Party Name: City of Sacramento v. Superior Court In and For Sacramento County

Attorney: [7] Fitzwilliam, Memering & McDonald, Fitzwilliam, Memering, Stumbos & DeMers, and M. H. Pothoven for Petitioners. [8] No appearance for Respondent. [9] Carl Kelsey, in pro. per., Kenneth Cayocca, J. Adrian Palmquist, Francis T. Cornish, T. Groezinger, Loton Wells and Charles McMillan for Real Pa...

Case Date: Monday July 02, 1962

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

205 Cal.App.2d 398, 10514, City of Sacramento v. Superior Court In and For Sacramento County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 35 Cal.2d 409, 21048, Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.
California - 57 Cal.2d 255, 20338, Roylance v. Doelger
California - 57 Cal.2d 57, 26484, Witt v. Jackson
California - 162 Cal.App.2d 434, 17602, S. F. Unified Sch. Dist. v. Cal. Bldg. Etc. Co.
California - 163 Cal.App.2d 714, 17338, Nels E. Nelson, Inc. v. Tarman

See all quotations