62 Cal.2d 40, 21291, Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Elec. Corp.

Citation: 62 Cal.2d 40, 41 Cal.Rptr. 73, 396 P.2d 377

Opinion Judge: [9] Tobriner

Party Name: Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Elec. Corp.

Attorney: [7] Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Ernest M. Thayer for Defendant and Appellant. [8] John D. St. Clair, Edward J. McFetridge and Hauerken, St. Clair, Zappettini & Hines for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Monday November 09, 1964

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

62 Cal.2d 40, 21291, Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Elec. Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
California - 54 Cal.2d 445, 25375, Harvey Mach. Co. v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.
California - 58 Cal.2d 862, 26927, Steven v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
California - 60 Cal.2d 92, 26984, Tunkl v. Regents of University of Cal.
California - 185 Cal.App.2d 488, 19083, Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. Parker

See all quotations