The Lord Chancellor v Charles Ete and Company Charles Ete (2nd Defendant) Ratookumar Manorbhai Patel (3rd Defendant)
Linked as:
Extract
The Lord Chancellor v Charles Ete and Company Charles Ete (2nd Defendant) Ratookumar Manorbhai Patel (3rd Defendant)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
- Legal Services Commission v Sham Loomba
- Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
CITES
CONSIDERS
- Access to Justice Act 1999 - Articles : S-3
- Legal Aid Act 1988
- The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts (Amendment) and Water Act 2003 (Transitional Provision) Regulations 2006
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites
- Legal Services Commission v Sham Loomba
- Harry Gordon Cressman and Barbara Gordon Cressman (Personal Representatives of Thomas Ashley Cressman (Deceased) v Coy of Kensington (SALES) Ltd v Randall McDonald [CA (Civil), 05/02/2004]
- Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
- Access to Justice Act 1999
- Legal Aid Act 1988
