Legal Services Commission v Sham Loomba
Linked as:
Extract
Legal Services Commission v Sham Loomba
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd v Sutton London Borough Council
- Legal Services Commission v Henthorn
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Sutton London Borough Council v Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd and Another
- R (Machi) v Legal Services Commission
- Deposit Protection Board v Dalia and Another
[See more]
FOLLOWS
CITES
- Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd and another
- Re Thompson and Venables (Tariff recommendations)
- Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company Ltd v L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates and Unitramp SA
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Mehari
- Oliver Fisher v Legal Services Commission
- Legal Services Commission v Henthorn
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- The Lord Chancellor (as Successor to the Legal Services Commission) v Charles Ete and Company
- The Legal Profession Act Cap 370A of the Laws of Barbados
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank
- R (Machi) v Legal Services Commission
- Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company Ltd v L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates and Unitramp SA
- Legal Services Commission v Henthorn
- Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council (No 1)