Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
Linked as:
Extract
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
DISAPPROVES
CONSIDERS
- Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd
- Bank of New South Wales v Goulburn Valley Butter Company Proprietary
- Banque Belge pour l'Etranger v Hambrouck
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-85
- Gaming Act 1845 - Articles : S-XVIII
- Commercial Banking Company of Sydney v Mann
[See more]
REFERS TO
APPLIES
CITES
- Re Blundell. Blundell v Blundell
- Ministry of Health v Simpson (sub nom Re Diplock, Diplock v Wintle)
DISTINGUISHES
- Transvaal & Delagoa Bay Investment Company Ltd v Atkinson
- Hill v William Hill (Park Lane) Ltd
- Morgan v Ashcroft
CITED in
REFERRED in
- Abdul Rahim bin Abdul Hamid v Perdana Merchant Bankers Bhd
- Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor; United Merchant Finance Bhd
- The Lord Chancellor v Charles Ete and Company Charles Ete (2nd Defendant) Ratookumar Manorbhai Patel (3rd Defendant)
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Public Bank Bhd v Exporaya Sdn Bhd
- Goh Koon Suan v Heng Gek Kiau and Others
- Walsh v National Irish Bank Ltd
CONSIDERED in
- Management Corporation Strata Title No 473 v De Beers Jewellery Pte Ltd
- Rose v AIB Group (UK) Plc and another
- A-G v Equiticorp Industries Group Ltd (in statutory management)
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
- Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDaniels Ltd and Others Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDaniels Ltd and Others Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDanields Ltd and Others; Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another
- Abou-Rahmah and another v Abacha and Others
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
