Extract
R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
RESUELVE RECURSO
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
CITED in
CONSIDERED in
-
Richmond Boro Council Manchester City Council and Others v Watson/Stennett/Cobham/Armstrong
-
Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hurstville City Council
-
R (Chichvarkin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[See more]
-
Gilbert Stirk and Others v Bridgnorth District Council
-
R v Elmbridge Borough Council and Another
-
R Haringey Consortium v of Disabled People and Carers Association and Another
-
Timothy Charles Harris and Mrs. Angelika Harris v Broads Authority
-
Secretary of State for the Home Department v E
-
The King (on the application of Peyton Davies) v Oxford City Council
-
Wandsworth London Borough Council v A
-
Smethurst v Commissioner of Police
-
Hamed v R
-
The Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery and Another v Fowler Developments Ltd and Another
-
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
-
R (on the application of MS) v Home Secretary
-
Joanna Trafford v Blackpool Borough Council
-
R Andrew Plant v Lambeth London Borough Council
-
R v Permanent Secretary Ministry of Justice ex parte Lackston Robinson; Lackston Robinson v Daisy Coke, Michael Fennel, Edwin Jones, Pauline Findlay and George Philip (all members of the Public Service Commission [Consolidated proceedings]
-
Beverley Sinclair Senior v Commissioner of Customs & Excise and Another
-
A (a minor, by J B, her father and next friend) v Minister for Education
-
The Queen (on the application of Plantagenet Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Justice (First Defendant) The University of Leicester (Second Defendant) Leicester City Council (Third Defendant) The Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral of Saint Martin Leicester (First Interested Party) The Members for the Time Being of the Chapter, the Council and the College of Canons of the Cathedral and Metropolitical Church of Saint Peter York (Second Interested Party)
-
The Corporation of Hamilton v The Centre for Justice
-
The Queen and Dr. The Hon. Hubert Alexander Minnis v Lumane Nonord et Al Being 177 Residents and/or Occupants of Shanty Towns in the Bahamas
-
Treasure Bay (St. Lucia) Ltd v Gaming Authority, Attorney General and National Lotteries Authority
-
Nature Island Investment Company Ltd Appellant v Marpins Telecoms and Broadcasting Ltd ((in Receivership)) Respondent [ECSC]
-
The Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago v Dr. Keith Rowley the Prime Minister of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
-
Keep Chiswell Green v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
-
Georgia Elliott-Smith v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
-
R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte C
-
L1T FM Holdings UK Ltd v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the Cabinet Office (formerly Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy)
-
The Queen (on the application of Transport Action Network Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport
-
B4 v Secretary of state for the Home Department
-
Nature Island Investment Company Ltd v Marpins Telecoms and Broadcasting Ltd ((in Receivership))
-
Sophie Coulthard v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
REFERRED in
-
Thame Town Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
-
R (Dixon and Another) v Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs
-
Koh Beng Teck v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya
[See more]
-
Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara and Others v A Child and Others (Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor, intervener)
-
Jennie Sharokin Arthur v London Borough of Barnet
-
R v Richmond London Borough Council, ex parte Watson. ; R v Manchester City Council, ex parte Stennett. ; R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex parte Cobham. ; R v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, ex parte Armstrong
-
R (oao (1) The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens, (2) O, a child, by her litigation friend, AO, and (3) A, a child, by her litigation friend, NJM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
-
The King on the application of Ecpat UK (Every Child Protected Against Trafficking) v Kent County Council
-
Elliott Associates L.P v The London Metal Exchange
-
Heathrow Hub Ltd v The Secretary of State for Transport
-
R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Transport (Heathrow Airport Ltd, interested party)
-
R (on the application of Williams) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Heathrow Hub Ltd v The Secretary of State for Transport
-
R Neil Richard Spurrier v The Secretary of State for Transport
-
Annington Property Ltd v The Secretary of State for Defence
-
R (on the application of DAT (by his mother and litigation friend) and another) v West Berkshire Council
APPLIED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in