R Talpada v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERS TO

• The Queen (on the application of Radha Naran Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mohammad Mohibullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg

APPLIES

• Wimal Mudiyanselage v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITES

• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Preston
• Kebbell Developments Ltd v Leeds City Council Collingham with Linton Parish Council (Interested Party)
• H.T.v Ltd v Price Commission

[See more]

• EK (Ivory Coast) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Nabeel Ahsan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte MFK Underwriting Agencies Ltd and Others and related applications

CONSIDERS

• Mehmood (legitimate expectation)
• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another

[See more]

• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Human Rights Act 1998

CONSIDERED in

• PAA (Anonymity Direction Made) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the Application of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis) v Police Medical Appeal Board
• Between: CTMH Holdings Ltd Applicant v The Government of the Cayman Islands Respondent (1) Narayana Hrudayalaya Private Ltd (2) Aster Caribbean Holdings Ltd Interested Parties

[See more]

• One Caribbean Media Group Ltd v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• The Queen (on the application of KK) v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust
• The King (on the application of Infinity Broadband Ltd) (trading as C3 Pure Fibre) Applicant v The Utility and Competition Office Respondent
• Between: CTMH Holdings Ltd Applicant v The Government of the Cayman Islands Respondent (1) Narayana Hrudayalaya Private Ltd (2) Aster Caribbean Holdings Ltd Interested Parties
• Mohammed Ali Raja v London Borough of Redbridge
• The King on the application of the Duke of Sussex v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ronnie Latayan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• London Historic Parks and Gardens Trust v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government
• The King (on the application of Mehmet Baybasin) v Secretary of State for Justice
• The King on the application of Suffolk Energy Action Solutions SPV Ltd v The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
• R Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
• The Queen (on the application of Sohrab Mahmud) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
• The Queen (on the application of Sohrab Mahmud) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
• Keep Bourne End Green v Buckinghamshire Council (formerly Wycombe District Council)
• The King (on the application of TTT, by her mother and litigation friend UUU) v Michaela Community Schools Trust
• R Linda Ginn v HM Senior Coroner for Inner London
• F v Surrey County Council
• The King (on the application of Infinity Broadband Ltd) (trading as C3 Pure Fibre) Applicant v The Utility and Competition Office Respondent
• Good Law Project Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• Good Law Project Ltd v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• The King on the Application of Philip Webb v London Borough of Bromley
• Imrankhan Mahmdiqbal Pathan v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPLIED in

• PAA (Anonymity Direction Made) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Dean Pearce) v The Parole Board of England and Wales

CITED in

• The Queen (on the application of AB by his litigation friend MB) v Slough Borough Council
• Namit Jetly v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• RD (A child by his litigation friend LD) v Worcestershire County Council

[See more]

• Inclusion Housing Community Interest Company v Regulator of Social Housing
• The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R Emiljano Spahiu
• MXK, EH and HH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Cava Bien Ltd v Milton Keynes Council
• Derya Kartal Karagul v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERRED in

• R (on the application of TW) (No.2) v London Borough of Hillingdon
• The Queen (on the Application of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis) v Police Medical Appeal Board
• The Queen (on the Application of Esther Louise Leighton) v The Lord Chancellor

[See more]

• Bogden Alexander Adamescu v Bucharest Appeal Court Criminal Division, Romania
• The Queen (on the application of KK) v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v GA
• The King on the application of the Duke of Sussex v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R SWP v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Upon the application of Lehram Capital Investments Ltd) v Southwark Crown Court
• GA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
• F v Surrey County Council
• The King (on the application of Dean Dobson) v Secretary of State for Justice
• R (on the application of Dolan and Others) v the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and another
• R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of EG) (by his litigation friend The Official Solicitor) v Parole Board

This document cites

• The Queen (on the application of Radha Naran Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Preston
• H.T.v Ltd v Price Commission
• Mehmood (legitimate expectation)
• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• EK (Ivory Coast) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• R (S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mohammad Mohibullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte MFK Underwriting Agencies Ltd and Others and related applications
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another
• Mandalia v Secretary of State for theHome Department
• Nabeel Ahsan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Wimal Mudiyanselage v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kebbell Developments Ltd v Leeds City Council Collingham with Linton Parish Council (Interested Party)
• R Talpada v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Human Rights Act 1998