Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Appeal Act 1968
• Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964
• Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991

[See more]

• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Criminal Justice Act 2003
• Pollard v The Queen
• State of Trinidad and Tobago v Boyce
• Sankar v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Smith v R
• Muirhead v The Queen (Jamaica)
• Golder v United Kingdom (App No 4451/70)

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• R v Sullivan (Colin Thomas)

CONSIDERS

• Attorney General for Saint Christopher and Nevis v Rodionov
• Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher

[See more]

• R v Weir (Michael Clive)
• La Vende v The State
• Berry v The Queen
• Woolmington v DPP
• Stirland v DPP
• Stafford v The State (Note)
• R v Clinton
• Bally Sheng Balson v The State
• Anderson (James McAulay) v HM Advocate
• Pringle v The Queen
• Scott v The Queen
• Nankissoon Boodram, Ramsingh (Joel), Ramiah (Joey), Ramkalawan Singh, Sankeralli (Russell), Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State
• R v Turnbull
• Mitchell v The Queen
• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• Porter v Magill
• R v Williams (Roy)
• Barrow v The Queen
• R v Aziz
• R v Fulcher
• Kizza Sealey and Another v The State
• Bhola v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Smith v The Queen (Jamaica)
• R (Kenneally) v Snaresbrook Crown Court; R (on the application of Kenneally) v Rampton Hospital Authority
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen

REFERS TO

• Pratt et Al v Attorney General et Al
• Watson v The Queen
• R v Medway

[See more]

• Peter Dougal v R
• R v Gray ; R v Liggins ; R v Rowlands ; R v Ridings
• R v Jones (Brian)
• R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman
• Crosdale v The Queen
• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• Porter v Magill
• David Shields Montgomery (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents) Andrew Alexander Marshall Coulter (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents)
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• R v King (Ashley)

CITES

• R v Azam; R v Altaf; R v Hussain
• R v Blake

[See more]

• R v Walters
• R v Devonport
• R v Platten
• Jagdeo Singh v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• White v The Queen

APPLIES

• Ernest Lockhart v The Queen
• Darmalingum v Mauritius
• De Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing

[See more]

• Barnes, Desquottes and Johnson v R, Scott and Walters v R
• Michel v the Queen
• Tido v R
• R v Vye ; R v Wise ; R v Stephenson
• Thompson v The Queen

FOLLOWS

• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Daniel Dick Trimmingham v The Queen
• DELCOURT v. BELGIUM

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R v Devonport
• R v Platten
• R v Aziz
• Porter v Magill



See all quotations

• R (Kenneally) v Snaresbrook Crown Court; R (on the application of Kenneally) v Rampton Hospital Authority
• R v Medway
• R v King (Ashley)
• Porter v Magill
• R v Coutts (Graham James)
• R v Azam; R v Altaf; R v Hussain
• R v Sullivan (Colin Thomas)
• R v Turnbull
• Director General of Fair Trading v Proprietary Association of Great Britain; Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2)
• R v Fulcher
• R v Walters
• R v Jones (Brian)
• Woolmington v DPP
• Peter Dougal v R
• Stirland v DPP
• Watson v The Queen
• Tyler v Browning
• Darmalingum v Mauritius
• R v Clinton
• Mitchell v The Queen
• Thompson v The Queen
• Smith v R
• Millar v Dickson; Payne and Others v Heywood
• Kizza Sealey and Another v The State
• Bhola v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• David Shields Montgomery (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents) Andrew Alexander Marshall Coulter (Appellant) HM Advocate and Another (Respondents)
• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Patrick Reyes v The Queen
• Pollard v The Queen
• Crosdale v The Queen