Scott v The Queen

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• R v Blithing
• R v O'Loughlin
• R v Selvey

APPLIES

• R v Turnbull
• R v Whylie
• R v Sang

REFERRED in

• R v Weston (David Thomas)
• Chan Wai-keung v The Queen
• R v Bentley

[See more]

• Shand v The Queen
• R v Mitchell and another
• Stubbs v The Queen
• R v Khan (Sultan)

CITED in

• Chan Wai-keung v R
• Reid Dennis and Whylie v R Reece Taylor and Quelch v R
• Amore v R

[See more]

• Knights v R
• Smith v R
• McGregor & McGregor
• R v Chan Wai-keung
• Beckford and Another v R
• George Steele Brodie v HM Advocate
• Greg Robson Against Her Majesty's Advocate
• Rankin (Brian) and Carl McHargh v R
• Myrie (Aston)
• Conroy Prince v R
• Donnason Knights Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Travis Duporte v DPP
• Anita Maureen Beeres v Crown Prosecution Service West Midlands
• Grant v State
• Raymond Hunter v R

APPLIED in

• Henriques and Another v The Queen
• Reid (Junior) v The Queen; Dennis v The Queen; Whylie v The Queen; Reece v The Queen
• Amore v The Queen

[See more]

• R v Dragic
• R v Ebanks
• R v McLaughlin
• Webster v R

CONSIDERED in

• Palmer v R
• R v Michael Patrick Cole
• R v Filip Dragic

[See more]

• Henriques et Al v The Queen
• Beckford et Al v R
• Amore v R
• Ricketts v R
• Douglas v R
• R v Gary Prussia
• Henriques and Carr v R
• Beckford and Shaw v R
• Freemantle (Michael) v R
• Brown and McLaughlin v R
• Douglas (Calvin) v R
• Shand (Karl) v R
• Ricketts (Delroy) v R
• Knights (Donnason) v R
• R v Andrew Gammans and Another
• R v Reginald Desouza James
• R v Patel (Sabhas)
• R v Mary Irish
• The Queen v John Reece Mccormick
• Cioban v R
• Freemantle v The Queen
• R v Grant
• R v Gwyn Pring
• R v Le
• The Queen v Ivan Cacic
• Junior Reid and Others (Appellants) The Queen (Respondent) Errol Reece and Others (Appellants) The Queen (Respondent)
• DPP v BB
• Smith v The Queen
• Seymour v R
• Peter Norris Dupas v The Queen
• Ricketts v R
• Reid et Al v R; Reece v R
• Ainsworth v Burden
• The Queen v Peter Norris Dupas (No 3)
• Attorney General v Bhojwani
• Brown et Al v The Queen
• Lamey v The Queen
• Palmer v R
• Faheem Khalid Lodhi v R
• The Queen v Elvis Keley Ebanks
• Bennett v R
• Abraham (Nelson) v R
• R v Johnson
• R v Simpson; R v Powell
• Byers v Queen Ca 2
• Riley v R
• R v Peart
• R v Carroll
• R v Peart
• Reckford (Maitland) v R
• Abdool Salim Yaseen and Thomas v The State
• Rivero v The Queen
• R v Laidlay et Al
• Elshadae Ferguson v R
• John Murray v R
• Fraser v The Queen
• Knights v The Queen
• Giovanni Ivan Clarke v The Attorney General
• R v Cameron
• Batson et Al v R
• Mohinder Singh v R
• Warner and Daniel v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Nankissoon Boodram, Ramsingh (Joel), Ramiah (Joey), Ramkalawan Singh, Sankeralli (Russell), Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State
• Joel Bullard v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Fuller (Winston) v The State
• R v Ricketts
• R v Steven Grant
• Cannonier v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Isaac et Al v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Carlson Williams v R
• R v Wilson
• Carlson Williams v R
• Japhet Bennet v The Queen
• Mapp and Bissoon v The State
• The State v Nathaniel Augustine, otherwise called Kevin Dass
• Sylvester et Al v The State
• Hyles v Director of Public Prosecutions; Williams v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Attorney General's Reference No. 1 of 2004 (Re Matthews et Al)
• Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
• Duporte v DPP
• 1) Jamoy Warner 2) Evan Daniel v DPP
• Omar Miller v R
• Bertram Clarke v R
• Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
• Dionicio Salazar v The Queen
• R v Lobban
• R v Khan
• Romaine Thomas v R
• R v Pop (Aurelio)
• Omar Blake v R
• R v Kelly
• Smith v The Queen (Jamaica)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1989] 2 All ER 305
• 89 CrAppR 153
• [1989] 2 WLR 924

[See more]

• [1989] AC 1242

FOLLOWED in

• Attorney General v Cooper 1989 Criminal Appeal No 29