Richardson v Richardson

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-28
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-31
• Dipper v Dipper

REFERS TO

• Lawrie v Lees
• Meier v Meier
• Carter v Carter

RELIES UPON

• Thynne v Thynne
• Sandford v Sandford
• N v N

APPLIES

• Minton v Minton

FOLLOWS

• Jessel v Jessel

CONSIDERED in

• Richardson v Richardson (No 2)
• Jones v Jones
• Société Eram Shipping Company Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation

REFERRED in

• PHILIPPA Carol Richardson v (1) Christopher MORTON (2) EATON Evans & Morris
• G. v G. (Periodical Payments)
• Mary Patricia Mutch v James Mutch

[See more]

• UD v DN (Schedule 1, Children Act 1989; Capital Provision)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1993] 4 All ER 673
• [1994] 1 Fam CR 53
• [1994] 1 WLR 186

[See more]

• [1994] 1 FLR 286

This document cites

• Jessel v Jessel
• Sandford v Sandford
• L v L
• Minton v Minton
• Dipper v Dipper



See all quotations

• Thynne v Thynne
• Carter v Carter
• Minton v Minton
• Golding v Crowle
• N v N
• Mills v Mills
• Lawrie v Lees
• Meier v Meier
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984