L v L

Core Citations

---

FOLLOWS

• Mills v Mills

REFERS TO

• Pachner v Parker

RESUELVE RECURSO

• L v L

APPLIES

• Russell v Russell
• Bennett v Bennett

CONSIDERS

• Benyon v Benyon
• Matrimonial Causes (Property and Maintenance) Act 1958 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes (Property and Maintenance) Act 1958

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Maintenance Agreements Act 1957
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-190
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1949 - Articles : S-6

DISTINGUISHES

• Hyman v Hyman

REFERRED in

• Brister v Brister
• Smethurst v Smethurst
• Minton v Minton

[See more]

• Wilkins v Wilkins
• G. v G. (Periodical Payments)
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Birch v Birch

CONSIDERED in

• Re M.(Deceased)
• Dennis Beighton (Petitioner) Winifred Mary Beighton (Respondent)
• Powys v Powys

[See more]

• Garner v Garner
• Chaterjee v Chaterjee
• C.R.M.R v K.L.R
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Coleman v Coleman

APPLIED in

• Wilkins v Wilkins
• Le Geyt v Mallett and Rodrigues

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1961] 3 All ER 834
• [1961] 3 WLR 1182
• [1962] P 101

APPROVED in

• Minton v Minton

This document cites

---

• Hyman v Hyman
• Russell v Russell
• Bennett v Bennett
• Mills v Mills
• Pachner v Parker



See all quotations

• Benyon v Benyon
• Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1949
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1859
• Maintenance Agreements Act 1957
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925
• Matrimonial Causes (Property and Maintenance) Act 1958