D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re T. (Minors) (International Child Abduction: Access) (Practice Note)

[See more]

• Re P (A Child) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re G. (A Minor) (Enforcement of Access Abroad)
• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re
• D v C (New Zealand)
• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)

REFERS TO

[See more]

• Re J, Petitioner
• Re W (Minors) (Child abduction: Unmarried father) ; Re B (A Minor) (Child abduction: Unmarried father)
• JR v MR
• Director General, Department of Families, Youth and Community Care v Hobbs
• Re J (Abduction: Wrongful Removal)

CONSIDERS

• Children (Scotland) Act 1995
• Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
• G v B

[See more]

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re H (Child Abduction) (Unmarried Father: Rights of Custody)
• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re H (National Youth Advocacy Service)
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 - Articles : SCH-1
• Children Act 1989 - Articles : S-13
• Children (Scotland) Act 1995 - Articles : S-2
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Child Abduction Act 1984 - Articles : S-1
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Children Act 1989
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 - Articles : S-8

RESUELVE RECURSO

• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re

CITES

• H (A Child)
• Re W. (Minors) (Abduction: Father's Rights)
• Re v-B (Abduction: Custody Rights)

[See more]

• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Re v-B (Minors) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Hunter v Murrow
• Re W; Re B (Child Abduction: Unmarried Father)
• Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Adan

CITED in

• State Central Authority & Spring-Ernst
• Re C (Abduction: Seperate representation of children)
• State Central Authority & Best (No. 2)

[See more]

• G-P (A Child)
• RCB as litigation guardian of EKV, CEV, CIV and LRV v The Honourable
• AD v CD v AD
• K v K (Abduction) (No 2)
• NG v OG
• GC v RD
• Re S (A Child) (Habitual Residence and Child's Objections) (Brazil)
• AH v CD
• Re. G (A Minor)
• Re S (A Boy, Born on [A Date]) M v F and Others
• Re Ik (A Child) Vk v Lk
• Re S (A Child) (Abduction: Article 13(b): Mental Health)
• C v S (Child Abduction: Hague Convention: Article 13)
• C v M
• S (Father) v D (Mother)
• R (S) v R (S)
• VK and AK v KK and in the matter of the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• VK and AK v CC
• M v A Health and Social Care Trust; in the matter of S (a child) (arranging for a child in care to live outside Northern Ireland)
• NT v LT
• SP (Father) v EB (Mother) (1st Respondent) KP (Through her guardian Mr John Power) (2nd Respondent)
• Madonna Louise Ciccone v Guy Stuart Ritchie (First Respondent) Rocco John Ritchie (No 1) (Second Respondent)
• H v K (First Respondent) B and M (by their Children's Guardian) (Second and Third Respondents)
• Re D (A Child) (Abduction: Child's Objections: Representation of Child Party)
• Re A and B (Children: Return order: Article 13(a) defence: 1980 Hague Convention)
• Nt and Rt v Ht and Mt
• CT v PS
• G v G
• R v R
• C (Children) (Abduction: Article 13 (b))
• S v C

CONSIDERED in

• RA v RQ
• L-S (A Child)
• X v Y and Z Police Force, A, B and C (by their children's guardian)

[See more]

• E.J. v E.D.
• L-S (A Child)
• Aam v Lb
• RI v FA
• ZM v NM
• AB v CD
• Z v Y
• Re F (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re F (Abduction: Child's Wishes)
• Re A (Hague Convention: Wrongful Retention)
• Re P (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• MW v Director-General, Department of Community Services
• R (A Child)
• B v P Re J (Child Abduction: Consent: Grave risk of harm)
• Re I (A Child) (Contact Application: Jurisdiction)
• AX v CY
• AVH v SI and Another
• Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council v KC
• Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council v KC
• Applicant parent v The Birth Mother
• C. T. v P. S
• Robinson v Robinson
• W v W
• NT v LT
• X (Child Abduction: Habitual Residence)
• M (A Child)
• D.M. v V.K.
• T.W. v A.W
• G v K
• D (A Child) (International Recognition)
• Re C (Children)
• Re P and Q (Hague Convention: Consent)
• An Application Under the 1980 Hague Convention Re P (A Child)
• An application under the 1980 Hague Convention v Re P (A Child)
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• Re K (A Child) (Northern Ireland)
• Z v D
• Chong Tai v Chong Tai
• Re A and B (Children: Return order: Article 13(a) defence: 1980 Hague Convention)
• Nt and Rt v Ht and Mt
• JK (Mother) v LM (Father)
• Re A.B. (A Child)(Grave risk defence: domestic violence)
• A Father v A Mother
• LC (Children)
• Heeralal v Heeralal
• K v E
• Davis v Davis
• P (I) v P (T)
• N(M) v N(R)
• Peterson v Medina
• Asiodu v Asiodu
• GW v EB
• J.A.H.O. v M.R
• Thorpe v Aleong
• McB v E
• C. v G. (Child Abduction (Poland) Grave Risk Defence)
• J.T.S. v M.K.S.
• CAO v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• D.M. v V.K.
• The Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991, and the Hague Convention, and ANU and AWU (Children), between AU v TNU
• R (Child Abduction: Parent's Refusal to Accompany)
• S.R.G. v R.G.
• Lrr v Col
• C (A Child) (Abduction: Article 13(b))
• A (Children) (Abduction: Article 13(b))
• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• F v G
• P (A Child) (Abduction: Child's Objections)

REFERRED in

• Re Z (Abduction)
• F (Children) (2008)
• Re S (Children) (Child Abduction: Joinder of Sibling)

[See more]

• Re GP (wrongful removal)
• Re F (Abduction: Refusal to Return)
• F v M (Abduction: Grave Risk of Harm)
• Ch v Gls
• Re S (Abduction: Children's Representation)
• Lcg v Rl
• LC v RRL and Others
• Re E (Abduction: Intolerable Situation)
• Re H (Abduction)
• Q (Applicant father) v R (Respondent mother) S and T (through their guardian JO) (Second and Third Respondents)
• X, Y and Z (children) (Retrospective Leave to Remove from the Jurisdiction)
• AO v ZP
• Cambra v Jones
• IB v MM
• ZM v NM
• Medway Council v JB (First Respondent) BB (Second Respondent) RM (Third Respondent) KB, NB, ZB, AB, KB, ALB and RB (Fourth to Tenth Respondents) Centre for the International Legal Protection of Children and Youth of the Slovak Republic (Intervener)
• Np v Jp (1) Tp (2)
• Re S (Care: Jurisdiction)
• W v W (Abduction: Joinder as Party)
• A v T
• A v B (Abduction: Declaration)
• Re P (Abduction: Child's Objections)
• Bdu v Bdt
• B v P (Hague Convention)
• S (Father) v D (Mother)
• Re D
• KR and SR
• M.S. v A.R
• Re- R (A Child) (Asylum and 1980 Hague Convention Application)
• AO v LA
• C v D
• AX v CY
• A (A Child) (Hague Abduction; Art 13(b): Protective Measures)
• Rehan Malik v Governor of HM Prison Hindley (No.2)
• C v M and Another
• Re WA (A Child) (Abduction) (Consent; Acquiescence; Grave risk of Harm or Intolerability)
• J v C (First Respondent) B (Second Respondent)
• Re F (Children)
• AAA v ASH and Others
• Re H (child)
• Re B (A Child) (abduction: Article 13(b))
• JM v RM
• G v G
• G v K
• Re NY (A Child) (1980 Hague Abduction Convention) (Inherent Jurisdiction)
• RS v KS (Abduction: Wrongful Retention)
• Re T (Abduction: Protective Measures: Agreement to Return)
• V.R v C.O'N.
• Re L (Grave risk of harm)(Child's Objections)
• MD v AA and Another
• Z v D
• Re G (Abduction: Consent/Discretion)
• A Father v A Mother
• Re W (Minors)
• AM v as
• I.F. v J.G.
• AA v RR
• C. v G
• G v P
• D.M. v V.K.
• Re A (A Child)
• Re A HA v MB (Brussels II revised: article 11(7) application)
• C.D.G. v J.B.
• E.G. v T.P.
• S.S. v K.A.
• Re KP (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• A (Children) (Abduction: Article 13(b))
• Re W
• E (Children) (FC)

APPROVED in

• Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal)

APPLIED in

• R (A Child)

FOLLOWED in

• Nottinghamshire County Council v K.B. and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 16/11/2006 Daily Cases
• [2007] 1 All ER 783
• [2006] All ER D 218 Nov

[See more]

• [2007] 1 FLR 961
• 367 NR 330
• [17/11/2006] TLR 1
• [2007] 1 Fam CR 1
• [2006] 3 WLR 989
• [2007] 1 AC 619

This document cites

---

• V.W. v. D.S., (1996) 196 N.R. 241 (SCC)
• Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Adan
• Re H (National Youth Advocacy Service)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)



See all quotations

• Re J (Abduction: Wrongful Removal)
• C. v C. (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• Hunter v Murrow
• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re
• H (A Child)
• Re P (A Child) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re J, Petitioner
• Re W; Re B (Child Abduction: Unmarried Father)
• Re W (Minors) (Child abduction: Unmarried father) ; Re B (A Minor) (Child abduction: Unmarried father)
• Re H (Child Abduction) (Unmarried Father: Rights of Custody)
• Re W. (Minors) (Abduction: Father's Rights)
• Re T. (Minors) (International Child Abduction: Access) (Practice Note)
• Re v-B (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights)
• Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
• Director General, Department of Families, Youth and Community Care v Hobbs
• Re G. (A Minor) (Enforcement of Access Abroad)
• Re v-B (Minors) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
• JR v MR
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Child Abduction Act 1984
• Children Act 1989
• Children (Scotland) Act 1995
• Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Convention on the Rights of the Child
• Federal Cases - Fawcett v. McRoberts