R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
Linked as:
Extract
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
- The Queen (on the Application of Salford Estates [No 2] Ltd) (Claimant) Durham County Council (Defendant) Tesco Stores Ltd (First Interested Party) Dalton Park Ltd (Second Interested Party)
- Davis, Newbold and White v Attorney General
- Turner v Minister for Environmental Sustainability
[See more]
CITED in
- Linda Kendall v Rochford District Council (First Defendant) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Second Defendant)
- R (Cherkley Campaign Ltd) v Mole Valley District Council [QBD]
- Attorney-General of Grenada v Coard and Others
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R (Cole, Rowland and Hawkes) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Grand Union Investments Ltd v Dacorum Borough Council
- R v McLoughlin R v Newell
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPEAL RESOLVED in
FOLLOWED in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
- Re Findlay
- R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson