R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan

CONSIDERS

• Re Findlay
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson

CONSIDERED in

• The Queen (on the Application of Salford Estates [No 2] Ltd) (Claimant) Durham County Council (Defendant) Tesco Stores Ltd (First Interested Party) Dalton Park Ltd (Second Interested Party)
• Davis, Newbold and White v Attorney General
• Turner v Minister for Environmental Sustainability

[See more]

• The Queen (on the application of Fox Strategic Land and Property Ltd) v Chorley Borough Council Preston City Council (First Interested Party) South Ribble Borough Council (Second Interested Party)
• R Ralston Wellington v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Bieber
• Ivan Crane v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant) Harborough District Council (Second Defendant)
• The Attorney General v Coard et Al
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• R Edmund Bruton v The Secretary of State for Justice
• Tadworth and Walton Residents' Association and Another v Secretary of State for Environment, Foods and Rural Affairs Walton Heath Golf Club Ltd and Another (Interested Parties)
• R v Justin Vance Turner
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley
• R v Oakes R v Restivo R v Roberts R v Simmons R v Stapleton
• R(Cherkley Campaign Ltd) v Mole Valley District Council
• R v Manish Shah
• Davis, Newbold and White v Attorney General

CITED in

• Linda Kendall v Rochford District Council (First Defendant) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Second Defendant)
• R (Cherkley Campaign Ltd) v Mole Valley District Council [QBD]
• Attorney-General of Grenada v Coard and Others

[See more]

• Timothy James House v Waverley Borough Council

REFERRED in

• R (Cole, Rowland and Hawkes) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Grand Union Investments Ltd v Dacorum Borough Council
• R v McLoughlin R v Newell

[See more]

• R (on the application of Irving) v Mid-Sussex District Council
• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Attorney General Appellant v [1] Bernard Coard [2] Callistus Bernard [3] Lester Redhead [4] Christopher Stroude [5] Hudson Austin [6] Liam James [7] Leon Cornwall [8] John Anthony Ventour [9] Dave Bartholomew [10] Ewart Layne [11] Colville Mc Barnette [12] Selwyn Stachan [13] Cecil Prime Respondents [ECSC]

DISTINGUISHED in

• Public Prosecutor v Norhisham Bin Mohamad Dahlan

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [19/12/1997] TLR 3
• [1998] 2 WLR 505
• [1998] QB 751

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley

FOLLOWED in

• Queen v Trevor Hamilton

APPLIED in

• The First Secretary of State and Another and Hammersmatch Properties Ltd

This document cites

---

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody ; R v Same, ex parte Pierson ; R v Same, ex parte Smart ; R v Same, ex parte Pegg
• Re Findlay
• R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson



See all quotations

• Criminal Justice Act 1991
• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Crime (Sentences) Act 1997