Steadman v Steadman

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Chaproniére v Lambert

REFERS TO

• Cooper v Critchley
• Countess Dowager of Shelburne and John Hamilton Fitzmaurice, an Infant, only Son of the Honourable Thomas Fitzmaurice and Lady Mary his Wife (two of Defendants), Plaintiffs; Morough Earl of Inchiquin, and Mary Countess of Orkney and Inchiquin his Wife; and said Thomas Fitzmaurice and Lady Mary his Wife, and Others, Defendants
• Britain v Rossiter

[See more]

• Essex v Essex
• Cooke v Tombs
• Dale v Hamilton
• Hughes v Morris
• Caton v Caton
• Williams v Williams
• McManus v Cooke
• Fowler v Fowler
• Forster v Hale
• Re De Nicols. De Nicols v Curlier
• Elliott v Roberts (C. P.) & Company
• Caddick v Skidmore

APPLIES

• Gray v Smith
• Kingswood Estate Company Ltd v Anderson
• Wakeham v Mackenzie

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-40
• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

[See more]

• Law of Property Act 1925
• Sale of Goods Act 1893 - Articles : S-4

CONSIDERED in

• Bourke v Roberts
• Town and County Betting Ltd, (Plaintiff) Melville Davies, (Defendant.)
• Casarin v Daly

[See more]

• Bourke v Roberts
• Re Gonin, decd
• Turnbull v Baronville
• Crevelle v Affoon
• Cox v Patrick et Al
• Abrikian (Harry) Kolleen (Russell) and Athol (Smith) v Wright (Arthur) and Wright ( Vera)
• Boysie Woolcock v William Hogg
• Daley (Rudolph) v RBTT Bank Jamaica Ltd Etal Walters v Rudolph Daley, RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd, Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd Harley Corporation Guarantee Trust Company Ltd v Etal Walters; Etal Walters v Rudolph Walters and RBYY Bank Jamaica Ltd [Consolidated Suits]
• Mary Casarin v Charles Daly
• J.C. v W.C. (Specific Performance)
• Vlahos Pty Ltd and Andrew Vlahos(Applicants) v James Vlahos
• Gale v Eiley
• Toppin (Allan) v Raymond Lee, Desmond Lee and Stephen Chung
• Elsden v Pick
• C (J) v C (W)
• Schultz v Long Island Estate v Developers Ltd
• Symes v Couch and J.J. Couch Engineers Ltd
• Cox v National Housing Corporation
• Sagar v Mungroo and Sagar
• Claystone Ltd and Others v Eugene Larkin and Others
• Smatt v Lyons et Al
• Thomas v Trinidad and Tobago Housing Development Corporation
• McCook et Al v Hammond et Al
• JLT Financial Services Ltd v Gannon
• Bastian v Lyford Cay Company Ltd et Al
• Elias v George Sahely & Company (Barbados) Ltd
• Ramdhanie et Al v Collymore

CITED in

• Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Widin
• McCollin v Carter
• Brady v Brady; Re Brady (Deceased)

[See more]

• Barry Wellman v Alphonso Caesar 1993 Civil Jur. No. 465

REFERRED in

• Carr v Mcdonald's Australia Ltd
• Du Boulay and Others v Raggett and another
• Faulknor (Aubrey) v Pearjohn Investments Ltd and Yvonne Claudius

[See more]

• Al-Wazir v Islamic Press Agency Inc.
• Nash v Bermuda Mechanical Company Ltd and Elkins
• Take Harvest Ltd v Liu
• Grinsted v Britannia Brands (Holdings) Pte Ltd
• Cohen v Nessdale Ltd
• United Bank of Kuwait Plc v Sahib
• Orton v Collins and Others
• Clipper Maritime Ltd v Shirlstar Container Transport Ltd (Anemone, Athenian Anna, Athina K, Golden Med)
• Actionstrength Ltd (trading as Vital Resources) v International Glass Engineering in.GL.EN SpA and another
• Stack v Dowden

APPLIED in

• Sutton v Sutton
• Joseph Mathew and Another v Singh Chiranjeev and Another

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Harley Corporation Guarantee Investment Company Ltd v Estate Rudolph Daley, Etal Walters and RBTT Bank Jamaica Ltd

DISTINGUISHED in

• Nation Hardware Ltd v Norduth Development Company Ltd and another

FOLLOWED in

• PQR (mw) v STR

APPROVED in

• Mackie v Wilde (No. 2)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1973] 3 All ER 977
• [1973] 3 WLR 695
• [1974] QB 161

COMMENTED in

• Yaxley v Gotts and another

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Steadman v Steadman

This document cites

---

• Cooper v Critchley
• Kingswood Estate Company Ltd v Anderson
• Elliott v Roberts (C. P.) & Company
• Chaproniére v Lambert
• Cooke v Tombs



See all quotations

• Wakeham v Mackenzie
• Williams v Williams
• Countess Dowager of Shelburne and John Hamilton Fitzmaurice, an Infant, only Son of the Honourable Thomas Fitzmaurice and Lady Mary his Wife (two of Defendants), Plaintiffs; Morough Earl of Inchiquin, and Mary Countess of Orkney and Inchiquin his Wife; and said Thomas Fitzmaurice and Lady Mary his Wife, and Others, Defendants
• Gray v Smith
• Caddick v Skidmore
• Fowler v Fowler
• Essex v Essex
• McManus v Cooke
• Dale v Hamilton
• Re De Nicols. De Nicols v Curlier
• Hughes v Morris
• Forster v Hale
• Caton v Caton
• Britain v Rossiter
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Sale of Goods Act 1893
• Married Women's Property Act 1882