Katz v Katz

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-2
• Ash v Ash
• Pheasant v Pheasant

APPLIES

• Williams v Williams

APPLIED in

• Thurlow v Thurlow

REFERRED in

• Livingstone-Stallard v Livingstone-Stallard
• Hariram Jayaram v Saraswathy Rajahram
• Betty Frederica Daniels v Humphrey Mcdonald Daniels

[See more]

• Teo Hoon Ping v Tan Lay Ying Angeline
• Owens v Owens

NOT APPLIED in

• Bradley v Bradley

FOLLOWED in

• Bhanu Sekaramani v Nagamma
• Cheah Saw Hong; Tan Keok Yin
• Hariram Jayaram v Saraswathy Rajahram

[See more]

• Wong Siew Boey v Lee Boon Fatt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 3 All ER 219
• [1972] 1 WLR 955

CONSIDERED in

• E.H.J v K.S.J
• Wjb v Mmb, Er and Cl
• Santucci v Bell-Santucci

[See more]

• Guishard v Guishard (No. 2)
• Hamilton v Hamilton (Nee Toussaint)
• DT v CG
• Susan Mary Hamza v Mohamad Suleiman Hamza
• Kendall Owin Dornellien v Dyane Dornellien (nee Sebastian)
• Myke Brezhney Hamilton Petitioner v Martina Hamilton Nee Toussaint Respondent
• Ghany v Ghany
• Allen v Allen
• Margarita Myrtle Louis-Octave v Hamilton Octave

CITED in

• Cms Petitioner v Rgs Respondent

This document cites

• R. v. Bazinet, (1986) 14 O.A.C. 15 (CA)
• Williams v Williams
• Ash v Ash
• Pheasant v Pheasant
• Divorce Reform Act 1969