Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• AA (Third Party Maintenance) Bangladesh
• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERS TO

• KS (India) v Entry Clearance Officer
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ali
• MK (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer

[See more]

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)

REVERSES

• Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)

CONSIDERS

• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : SCH-2
• Social Security Administration Act 1992 - Articles : S-78

[See more]

• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-84
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
• Social Security Administration Act 1992
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-3
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration Act 1971

CONSIDERED in

• Kj (Working Holiday Maker – Third Party Support)
• Sultana and Others (rules: waiver/further enquiry; discretion)
• Ahmed (benefits: proof of receipt; evidence)

[See more]

• R (on the application of Patel) v Home Secretary
• Fayyaz (Entrepreneurs: paragraph 41-SD(a)(i) - “provided to”)
• R (on the Application of Ahmed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (3C Leave — Whether “Granted”)
• Jahangara Begum and Others (maintenance – savings)
• R Sri Prathinik Consulting Ltd v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Alexey Pallovich Buydov v Entry Clearance Officer, Moscow
• BS, SS, AV and MS (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Sandia Behary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R MD Gulam Azam & Proshanto Gosh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• CS (Tier 1 – home regulator)
• IK (Immigration Rules – construction – purpose)
• As, Ss, (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Terrelonge (para 399(b))
• Chau Le (Immigration Rules - de minimis principle)
• The Queen (on the Application of A O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• HH (Iraq) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SF (Afghanistan) and Anr v Entry Clearance Officer
• R (Efuntomi Merrimen Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Singini (para 319C – switching to dependant category)
• Queen on the Application of Bwalya Valentine Mumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Sarah Khatoon (Claimant/Appellant) v The Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad and Another
• R Longrid Supawan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Bhudia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MD Shahin Uddin v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mahmood (Paras. S-LTR.1.6. & S-LTR.4.2.; Scope)
• R JB v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Jonathan Ruhumuliza
• R Jie Wang and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Wasif) v Home Secretary
• Mirza (ACCA Fundamental level qualification – not a recognised degree)
• R Hasan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Nadeem Ahmad Anjum v Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad
• R Mohammad Hasan Imam v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mab (Para 399; "Unduly Harsh")
• Ogundimu (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
• Ps (Working Holidaymaker – Maintenance – Assessment)
• R (on the application of JM) v Home Secretary
• R Kalsi and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R JM (Zimbabwe) (by his parent and litigation friend SM) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Amjid Khan
• MN Wohhab Al-Azad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the Application of MP1 v Secretary of State for Defence
• The King (on the application of CX1, CX2, CX4, CX6 and CX7) (“CX1 No.2”) v Secretary of State for Defence
• The King on the application of JB (Ghana) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Masum Ahmed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Waqar Ali
• R Afzal v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Juned Ahmed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Have Rexhaj
• LND 1 v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Um (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AK (Nepal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Pokhriyal v Secretary of State for the Home Department Hussain v Same
• R (on the Application of MM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Admin Ct]
• MM (Lebanon) and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Master AF (Interested Party) Sheffield Asian Community Action Group (Intervener)
• Saqib Hameed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Saqib Hameed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• HS v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs
• AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REFERRED in

• R Mohammad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ms and Others (Family Reunion: “in Order to Seek Asylum”)

[See more]

• R Abdullah Bashir Ahmed v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• Hanson Olatunde v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• KS (India) v Entry Clearance Officer
• Varsani v Entry Clearance Officer
• Roli Nesiama v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer
• R Raza Shahid Syed and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Anwar Sajjad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Sandip Narpatsinh Sayaniya v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
• Khanum & Others (Paragraph 353B) [Upper Tribunal]
• Jacqueline Elizabeth Edgehill and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ramesh Sapkota and another v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer [SC]
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica)
• Liew Teong Teh v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica)
• The Queen (on the application of Sandia Behary) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Office v Waleed Ahmad Khattak
• MN Wohhab Al-Azad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King (on the application of CX1, CX2, CX4, CX6 and CX7) (“CX1 No.2”) v Secretary of State for Defence
• MD (Jamaica) and GE (Canada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Hoque and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• R Afzal v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SH (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Ellis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Discretionary Leave Policy; Supplementary Reasons)
• ZN (Afghanistan) and Others v Entry Clearance Officer and Another
• Raju and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Jie Wang and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Muhammad Safeer (and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• LND 1 v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (W, a Child by his Litigation Friend J) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Um (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• KA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AK (Nepal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• A and Others v HM Treasury (Application by Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others)
• ST (a child, by his Litigation Friend VW) & VW v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITED in

• R West London Vocational Training College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Arshad Iqbal & Dependants v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Raju v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R Iqbal v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (on the application of JW and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Tier 1 Investor; Control; Investments)
• Begum (Employment Income; Rules/Article 8)
• Neshanthan (Cancellation or Revcation of ILR)
• Chege ("Is a Persistent Offender")
• Tanvir Babar v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Arthur Obafemi Cecil Decker v Secretary of State for The Home Department (First Respondent) The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Second Respondent)
• R NM v The London Borough of Islington Northamptonshire County Council First (Interested Party) The Parole Board Second (Interested Party)
• R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department R (Ali) v Same(Liberty and Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening)
• R Kalsi and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the Application of MP1 v Secretary of State for Defence
• The King on the application of JB (Ghana) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Dahir Elmi Abdi v Entry Clearance Officer
• CDS (PBS "available" Article 8) Brazil; CDS v Secretary of State for Home Department
• Wimal Mudiyanselage v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

COMMENTED in

• RS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPLIED in

• French v Entry Clearance Officer, Kingston
• R Hasan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Bossade; Bossade (ss 117A-D - Interrelationship with Rules)

[See more]

• MF (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
• Ms Hawa Ahmed Abubakar v Entry Clearance Officer (Sannaa)
• R (on the Application of AZ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Statelessness “Admissible”)
• Yarce (Adequate Maintenance: Benefits) [Upper Tribunal]
• R Masum Ahmed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

FOLLOWED in

• R (on the application of "T") v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Syed v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Pembele (Paragraph 399(B)(1) - "Valid Leave" - Meaning) [Upper Tribunal]

[See more]

• Laurent Wa Mundeba v Entry Clearance Officer ? Nairobi

DISTINGUISHED in

• Ian Burnip and Others v Birmingham City Council and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2009] NR Uned 222
• 16/12/2009 Daily Cases
• [2010] 2 All ER 535

[See more]

• [2010] Imm AR 203
• [2010] INLR 268
• [2010] 1 WLR 48

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)
• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MK (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer
• MW (Liberia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AA (Third Party Maintenance) Bangladesh
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ali
• KS (India) v Entry Clearance Officer
• Social Security Administration Act 1992
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration Act 1971
• Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
• Human Rights Act 1998