Roli Nesiama v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Linked as:
Extract
Roli Nesiama v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
- Re Findlay
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another
- Bd (Work Permit – “Continuous Period”)
[See more]
APPLIES
CONSIDERS
- Immigration Act 1971
- Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-3
- Immigration Act 1971
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Vladimir Granovski (and 3 Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Bd (Work Permit – “Continuous Period”)
- EK (Ivory Coast) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (Khatun and Others) v Newham London Borough Council
- Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)
