Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Linked as:
Extract
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
APPLIES
CONSIDERS
- R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn
- Administration of Justice Act 1982 - Articles : S-4
- Police Act 1964 - Articles : S-48
DISTINGUISHES
FOLLOWED in
- Aitken v Scottish Ambulance Service
- Reilly v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Alford v Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Police
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Allan v Greater Glasgow Health Board
- (1) Geoffrey James Sandford (2) Maureen Lydia Scherer (Executors of the Estate of Lydia Ellen Rose Sandford, Deceased) v London Borough of Waltham Forest
- Porter v Oamps Ltd
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Kirkland-Veenstra and Another v Stuart and Another
- Danns and another v Department of Health
- Quintano and Others v The State of New South Wales and Another
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
- Capital & Counties Plc v Hampshire County Council
- Susan Smith (on her own behalf and as administrator of the Estate of Philip Hewett, Deceased) (1st Appellant) Colin Redpath (on his own behalf and as Executor of the Will of Kirk James Redpath, Deceased) (2nd Appellant) Courtney Ellis (A Child) by her Litigation Friend Karla Ellis and Karla Ellis (3rd and 4th Appellants) v The Ministry of Defence
- Welton v North Cornwall District Council
[See more]
CITED in
- R (North Yorkshire Police Authority) v The Independent Police Complaints Commission and Another
- Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd (No 5)
- COMPAGNIE NOGA DIMPORTATION Et DEXPORTATION SA and NESSIM D. GAON and 1) AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP Ltd and Mrs MARYAM ABACHA and Mr MOHAMMED SANI ABACHA as Personal Representatives of GENERAL SANI ABACHA deceased and CHIEF ANTHONY A. ANI
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Desmond v The Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police
- Ancell v McDermott
- M and Another v London Borough of Newham and Others; X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPEAL RESOLVED in