Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
Linked as:
Extract
Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Ramanoop
- Halford v Brookes and Another
- Beckford v The Queen
[See more]
FOLLOWS
- R (Rusbridger and another) v Attorney General
- Hepburn v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
- Macnaughton v Macnaughton's Trustees
[See more]
REFERS TO
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
- R (on the application of Zia and Another) v Home Secretary
- Jonathan Anthony Crowley v Commonwealth of Australia
- R NM v Independent Appeal Panel of [A London Borough] Head Teacher and Board of Governors of [A North London] School (First Interested Party) Secretary of State for the Department of Children, Schools and Families (Second Interested Party)
[See more]
APPLIED in
- NTC and Others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Kamil Najim Abdullah Alseran and Another v MRE and Others
CITED in
- Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex (Disclosure No 1)
- Sarah Jane Young v John Anthony Downey
- Kelly Minio-Paluello v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
[See more]
REFERRED in
- MR v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Mohd Fakry bin Sidek v Mohamad Kusini bin Johari dan lain-lain
- Ashby Construction Sdn Bhd v Bank Negara Malaysia
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
FOLLOWED in
COMMENTED in
RELIED UPON in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Hepburn v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
- R (Rusbridger and another) v Attorney General
- Murray and Another v Dunn and Others
- Bank of Scotland v A Ltd and Others (Serious Fraud Office, interested party)