Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd

REFERS TO

• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Draco AB's SPC Application

[See more]

• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (No 2)
• Boston Scientific Ltd v Julio C Palmaz
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others
• Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

APPLIES

• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S

CITES

• Palmaz's European Patents (UK)
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)
• Palmaz v Boston Scientific Bv; Expandable Grafts Partnership v Boston Scientific Bv sub nom Palmaz's European Patents (UK), Re; Boston Scientific Ltd v Palmaz

[See more]

• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent
• Boston Scientific Ltd and another v Palmaz and another
• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)
• Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Brugger v Medic Aid Ltd
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)

DISTINGUISHES

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-3

CONSIDERED in

• Rovi Solutions Corporation (a company incorporated in the state of California, USA) and Another v Virgin Media Ltd and Others
• Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) v Novartis AG (a company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland)
• Theresia Marlys Benker v The Comptroller General of Patents

[See more]

• Sony Communications International AB v SSH Communications Security Corporation
• Environmental Defence Systems Ltd v Synergy Health Plc and Others
• Swarovski-Optik KG v Leica Camera AG and Another
• Claydon Yield-O-Meter Ltd v Mzuri Ltd
• Generics (U.K.) Ltd trading as Mylan and Another v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Third Party)
• Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH
• Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd
• Meter-Tech LLC and Another v British Gas Trading Ltd
• Garmin (Europe) Ltd v Koninklijke Philips N.v (a company existing under the laws of the Kingdom of the Netherlands)
• Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents

CITED in

• Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v The Comptroller-General of Patents
• Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Ltd
• Astellas Pharma Inc. v Comptroller General of Patents

[See more]

• Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents
• Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Ltd
• Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd

REFERRED in

• Safestand Ltd v Weston Homes Plc
• Abraxis Bioscience LLC v The Comptroller-General of Patents
• Nokia Technologies OY v Oneplus Ltd Technology (Shenzhen) Company, Ltd

[See more]

• Newron Pharmaceuticals SPA v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Trade Marks and Designs
• Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v Novartis AG
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• Actavis Group PTC EHF and Others (Respondents)v ICOS Corporation and another (Appellants)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2009 RPC 23
• [2009] 109 BMLR 78

COMMENTED in

• H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)

This document cites

---

• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham Plc (No.2)
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)



See all quotations

• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Ltd and Others
• Brugger v Medic Aid Ltd
• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Boston Scientific Ltd and another v Palmaz and another
• Palmaz v Boston Scientific Bv; Expandable Grafts Partnership v Boston Scientific Bv sub nom Palmaz's European Patents (UK), Re; Boston Scientific Ltd v Palmaz
• Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (No 2)
• H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd
• Palmaz's European Patents (UK)
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Johns-Manville Corporation's Patent
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)
• Boston Scientific Ltd v Julio C Palmaz
• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Draco AB's SPC Application
• Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Patents Act 1977
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S
• BASF AG v Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom (BIE).
• Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products
• Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action relating to proprietary medicinal products
• Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products
• Council Directive 81/851/EEC of 28 September 1981 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to veterinary medicinal products